Just before 3AM, NUR wrote:   
   > Since you live online   
      
   This is ironic in light of some of the stuff I've seen.    
   *clears throat*   
      
   Do you not see the irony of accusing others of spending too much time on the   
   internet while arguing online at nearly 3AM local time?   
      
   NUR continued:   
   > you know I have the goods on your sorry   
   > excon ass, this is why you hang around   
   > and continue with your patented gaslighting   
   > exercise because you have nothing else.   
      
   Epistemologically speaking, I certainly do not _know_ that you have any   
   "goods" on me (that is to say, awareness of your mere bluffs does not   
   constitute _knowledge_ in the proper sense).   
      
   As for gaslighting, are you honestly saying that asking you about your   
   position constitutes gaslighting? Does it leave you that intellectually   
   frustrated? Quick note about gaslighting: not every question which causes you   
   to question your own sanity    
   constitutes gaslighting; on the contrary, in some instances the problem might   
   actually be with your own shaky grip on reality.   
      
   NUR wrote:   
   > So do you want to answer now regarding   
   > your criminal past as a convicted felon?    
   > Sooner or later you will be forced to,    
   > one way or the other.    
      
   Ooh! Soon I will be _forced_ to discuss my past. Interesting! Can you   
   elaborate on how I will be forced to do so? Will this be after an extradition,   
   and before a court? I really enjoy your bluffs, and thus am interested in the   
   details.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)