From: dalehusband@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, February 2, 2020 at 10:11:13 AM UTC-6, stephan Beyer wrote:   
   > Dale.    
   > you are pretty far off. Subhiazal did not pick a fight with baha.  Subhiazal   
   was betrayed by his brother who tried to usurp his position as leader. The   
   Primal Point, The Bab Gave him that title and role as leader.    
   > Baha then tried to posion Subhiazal and frame him for treason. Bahais   
   murdered an Azali in akka.     
   > Subhiazal was a true leader. The Babs movement did not fail. But left its   
   mark in history in the constitutional revolt. You are using bahai history and   
   that is why you are so far off. They need The Bab to be a nobody artist   
   because then Bahaullah does    
   not need real legitimacy to steal his brothers god given position.     
   > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Constitutional_Revolutio   
   #Notable_participants   
   > its funny how you claim your against the bahais yet promote their twisted   
   view of history.   
      
   Stephan, nice to see you again, NOT!   
      
   Do you really enjoy being Wahid Asshole's useful idiot of the week?   
      
   If Sub-i-Azal was such a great leader, why was it so easy for Baha'u'llah to   
   overthrow  and discredit him, gaining the loyalty of the vast majority of the   
   former Babis in the process?   
      
   Why would the Bab appoint such an incompetent person to lead the Babis after   
   him? That makes him look stupid too.   
      
   Are you simply incapable of using any logic?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)