On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 11:10:23 AM UTC-5, Ezio Auditore da Firenze   
   wrote:   
   > Keep the questions coming Denis.   
      
   I certainly intend to.   
      
   Ezio continued:   
   > I think he is dodging my deposition offer   
   > because he has never had a lawyer.    
      
   Agreed. I too seriously doubt Nima 'Double Bankruptcy' Hazini has ever had a   
   lawyer. Now, mind you, I do not doubt that the family of Nima 'Mommy Provides   
   Me With A Place To Stay' Hazini could provide him with legal support, if such   
   were needed for    
   something serious, but I doubt they'd provide such for him to pursue his   
   infantile fantasies about court cases settling internet beefs.   
      
   Ezio continued:   
   > He has sometimes claimed to be one himself.   
      
   He even got his wife to refer to him as such (or he slipped such in to a piece   
   he helped her write?). I wonder if he lied to her, and convinced her that he   
   is a lawyer.   
      
   Ezio continued:   
   > An account identifying itself by the name   
   > of Sophia is sometimes seen and its operator   
   > claiming to be his lawyer, sans last name,    
   > court mandated fax line, or snail mail office   
   > address and email address. Most unorthodox   
   > for real lawyers.   
      
   Yep, a mononymous lawyer who threatened or challenged people to legal action   
   online, without any contact information aside from an e-mail. And Nima   
   considers it "bullying" when we question the existence of "Sophia". And he   
   expects those of us familiar    
   with his many lies to take his word for it when he makes further claims about   
   this fictional character (e.g. that she now works for Alexandria   
   Ocasio-Cortez, that she said she confirmed Nima's claims about who we   
   allegedly work for, that she said Nate is    
   too small for her to be concerned with, legally). It's all just hilarious.   
      
   Ezio continued:   
   > I am offering to LITERALLY sit in a room for   
   > hours with his attorney (he need not be    
   > present if he is afraid or angry at me) and   
   > do so in a country I have no legal ties of   
   > citizenship and residency in. I am offering   
   > to do this on my own dime despite not wanting   
   > to incur any debt.    
      
   As has already been alluded to, I am confident Nima will never meet this   
   challenge, as he has been bluffing all along. My only question is if he is   
   loony enough to ask his more well to do family to provide him with a lawyer   
   for this task, and risk    
   enduring their concerned looks and attempts to stifle smirks or resist eye   
   rolling, before being told no. Either way, no lawyer will be contacting you, a   
   sure sign Nima was bluffing all along.   
      
   While we're on this topic, Nima has claimed for years (for perhaps well over a   
   decade) that he has mountains of evidence against numerous people, as well as   
   organizations (like various Baha'i institutions), the Russians, the FBI, the   
   German government,    
   FaceBook, et cetera. But how come he has not brought a single case? Why has it   
   just been years and years of mere assertions, with no action? I think to ask   
   the question is to answer it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)