From: denisgiron1978@gmail.com   
      
   Nate wrote in reply to Matt:   
   > Speaking of suspicion, Nima could always   
   > accept my offer to let his lawyer depose me    
   > in a, you know, deposition, under oath, either   
   > in Australia or remotely via video call.    
   > Without an attorney for myself.    
      
   I’m curious what Matt thinks about the above. Is Matt aware that Nima has   
   asked us questions, online, related to Roya’s passing? Is Matt aware that   
   Nima has openly fantasized about taking these questions into a legal sphere?   
   Is Matt aware that if    
   Nate gave untruthful answers during a formal deposition such could constitute   
   perjury (which is not the case with answers merely given over the Internet)?   
   Is Matt aware that Nima claims to have lawyers?    
      
   With all that in mind, does Matt think Nima’s lawyer(s) should take up   
   Nate’s offer to be deposed?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)