home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.religion.bahai      Discussion of the Baha'i Faith      33,166 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 32,503 of 33,166   
   NUR to eku...@yahoo.com   
   Re: Who is Akira Zentradi Kalashnikov in   
   09 Feb 20 00:11:53   
   
   From: wahidazal66@gmail.com   
      
   Well said.   
      
   On Sunday, 9 February 2020 17:46:35 UTC+10, eku...@yahoo.com  wrote:   
   > Nate and Denis,  come get your boy!   
   >    
   > You know,  I'll admit I have had one mistaken judgment.  I thought when I   
   jumped into this shit that no one could embarrass y'all the way you embarrass   
   yourselves.  But your boy Dale has rapidly proved me wrong on that one.    
   > So like I said,  come get your boy!   
   > But first,  I'm calling him on all his bullshit. Do read along,  as some   
   does pertain to y'all.    
   >    
   > Dale, you are a pathetic,  sad,  excuse for a man.    
   >    
   > I'll called you out for twisting my words,  which you did quite obviously,    
   and you tried the same bullshit first thing in your next post,  demonstrating   
   to any readers what kind of a pathetic little cunt you are.    
   >    
   > Interesting how you cut and paste so much,  yet not doing it out the gate   
   when you pathetically tried accusing me of lying.    
   >    
   > I wrote:   
   > "I did not once say that Wahid is aging rapidly.   
   > In fact,  I denied Denis's assertion thereof,  and asked him if he'd seen   
   pics of Wahid's mom (I have) to base the comparison he made on.   
   > Go back and re-read!"   
   >    
   > And you still tried to twist that and accuse may of saying that Denis was   
   aging rapidly.    
   >    
   > READ IT AGAIN!!! IT'S CALLED READING COMPREHENSION MOTHERFUCKER!!! LEARN   
   IT!! Even if that means going back to elementary school,  pinche pendejo!!   
   >    
   > Wahid did an interview with you, thinking there was a little common ground,   
   (the context had zilch to do with communism) and later realized it wasn't   
   worth that when you made some whitey racist statement.    
   > White folks like us don't get to decide what racism is, honky!! So if your   
   using Noah Whitey Webster to silence black and brown folks' definitions of   
   racism,  guess what you're a racist!!!   
   > Now we white folks can be recovering racists but that requires listening to   
   black and brown people,  which is something I'm rather confident you don't do   
   if you had to urbandic a Mexican-Spanish cuss word as common as puto,   
   especially when you live in    
   a US state that was once part of Mexico.    
   > And if you think that somehow because it's not English it's therefore a   
   racial slur,  which the website you referenced didn't even say,  well you're   
   just bringing honky to new level.    
   >    
   > You don't even know what a slur is either!   
   >    
   > You haven't proven jack shit when calling Wahid a liar, or calling me one,   
   you just think that if you say it enough and make bullshit assertions like 'I   
   nailed him' around the assertions that eventually people will buy your   
   horseshit.   
   > Goebbels advocated the same thing,  whitey!!!   
   >    
   > But here's the real kicker...   
   > Nate,  take note.   
   >    
   > I asked where he accused Nate of paedophilia.   
   > Well, he did make a post as you cited with a header saying that and more...   
   > But you obviously didn't pay much attention to his citation,  and what that   
   link leads to (same link you posted a few lines down)...   
   > No surprise there as paying attention isn't your strong suit,  obviously!!   
   >    
   > Now, Nate, I know why you made the assertion of Wahid accusing you of being   
   a pedophile but not citing such an accusation!   
   >    
   > All Wahid did was paste a link without commentary...   
   >    
   > And what's that link lead to...   
   >    
   > A picture of Nate,  or at least a pic that seems match his profile on   
   Facebook, still for 3 minutes with a little bit of background music and a   
   caption that reads "Nate Abookire (paragraph) paedophile (paragraph) child   
   molester"   
   > And that would seem slanderous, but not only is there no evidence that Wahid   
   posted it, but that the poster was...   
   > Akira Kalashnikov!!!!!   
   > An alias used by Nate himself!!!   
   >    
   > Now at first,  it could be thought that someone else scooped Nate's AK   
   alias... but the page says that post has been there for a year.   
   >    
   > Do you really expect me to buy that if someone else put up such a slanderous   
   post (and if so, no proof it was Wahid... you said you had an ex-wife, Nate,   
   so, there's a potential enemy,  though I don't know any details on your   
   divorce) that you couldn't    
   get Vimeo to remove it after a full fucking year. If it had said, say, 3 days,   
   I could understand that Vimeo is 'still looking into it', but a year... I   
   can't believe y'all are so dumb as to think I'm that dumb.    
   >    
   > So I'd say that's 99% solid evidence you did it yourself (the other 1% just   
   being extreme stupidity on your part).   
   > Which means 1 of 2 things:   
   > 1. You outed yourself.    
   > (And I do REALLY want to give you the benefit of the doubt that such is not   
   the case)   
   > 2. You accused yourself through a fake name in an attempt to pin it on Wahid.   
   > Dude,  in your gonna try that,  have the fucking brains to at least you a   
   different alias!!! You sure are sloppy and karma is a motherfucker!!   
   >    
   > Denis, the article that Wahid linked about a Denis Giron getting busted for   
   child molestation,  does seem to be legit; however, while you probably   
   realized that I do know a little Spanish,  mine ain't that good.  So it'll   
   take me a little while to    
   research to determine if that article is about you or another Denis Giron, and   
   if the latter,  man, that really sucks that you got the same name as a goddam   
   child rapist.   
   > But for fuck's sake can you not see that your buddy Nate's stunt of creating   
   a fake name to falsely accuse himself and try to pin it on Wahid is majorly   
   backfiring right when your tailgating him????   
   >    
   > And finally,  back to you, Dale, you dumbfuck, honky, puto!   
   > Do you really think the people are so fucking stupid as to think you can   
   remember "EVERYTHING" from interactions that you say happened 10 years ago,   
   when you've just clearly demonstrated that you can't remember what was said in   
   a post less than 24    
   hours ago???   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca