Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.buddhism    |    All aspects of Buddhism as religion and    |    111,200 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 109,204 of 111,200    |
|    noname to niunian    |
|    Re: Attachment or detachment (was Re: Gh    |
|    10 Aug 15 01:57:28    |
      XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy       From: invalid@invalid.invalid              niunian wrote:              > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:45:41 +0200, liaM wrote:       >       >> On 8/10/2015 1:15 AM, niunian wrote:       >>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015 21:04:41 +0100, brian mitchell wrote:       >>>       >>>> Tang Huyen wrote:       >>>>       >>>>> The Sixth Ancestor Hui-neng awoke when he heard the "unestablished       >>>>> mind"       >>>>> of the Diamond scripture: ???????? "give rise to a thought/mind       >>>>> that is not established on anything, meaning not established on       >>>>> the six sense-fields". It may (or may not) experience them, but is       >>>>> not attached to them and is detached from them. That is the       >>>>> difference.       >>>>       >>>> My understanding of the unsupported thought is attention without an       >>>> object.       >>>       >>> I think it means the thought that is not based on anything except       >>> itself.       >>> It can be otherwise said as self-evident.       >>>       >>>       >>       >> Unsupported thought = seeing, hearing, feeling, smelling, talking       >> about what happens to arise in one's field of consciousness without       >> it also arousing desire, judgment, intention, or action.       >>       >> And if perchance such attachment occurs, allowing it to wither and       >> vanish. In this the neophyte thus stands at the gate of the Dharma.       >> Call it "equanimity" :)       >       > I disagree.              I think that LiaM has reasonably stated the gist of it.                     > I don't think the Diamond sutra was talking about the       > nature of emptiness of the mind. There is no such thought that is       > devoid of meaning. Even if there was, it would only lead to nihilism.       >       > The thought that is self sufficient and evident to be able to stand on       > its own without relying on anything else is something far greater than       > anything we can think of in our everyday life. It's original. It's the       > most precious and enlightening.              Can you list some examples of thought that is able to stand on its own       without relying on anything else?                     --       noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca