Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.buddhism    |    All aspects of Buddhism as religion and    |    111,200 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 109,313 of 111,200    |
|    Tang Huyen to Wilson    |
|    Re: Debate?    |
|    23 Jul 16 06:45:08    |
      XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen       From: tanghuyen@gmail.com              On 7/23/2016 5:02 AM, Wilson wrote:              > so many times in the last few years I've seen certain words labeled       > harmful and hateful and toxic when they certainly did not seem that way       > to me. So there is room for individual interpretation.       >       > My personal experience has been that most of the time such labels are       > used as a gambit to mentally and emotionally maneuver people into a       > place where they can be more easily manipulated.              If some people can be mentally and emotionally maneuvered       into a place where they can be more easily manipulated,       then they are quite susceptible in the first place.       Mental and emotional lapdogs or doormats, even if they       act biggies and meanies.              On these boards, only mere words on the screen are used       (I am not talking about people who charge in unasked to       dump hostile missives into others' private e-mail boxes),       and everything is free and everything is voluntary.              If the harmful and toxic words are harmful and toxic to       their authors, it is also free and voluntary, like when       you walk into a bar and the barista asks you what your       poison is.              However, when you use people's proclamations in their       own self-stated words and turn them against them, as a       mirror to them, to check whether they can live up to       them, you are not violating anybody's norm and standard,       but only apply people's self-declared norm and standard       back to them. There is nothing immoral or illegal in       such mirroring.              Of course, people may make any proclamation, and then       add disclaimers to the effect that, say, they are only       made for intellectual curiosity, but not for personal       attainment, then they are free of responsibility for       getting tested on them.              Tang Huyen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca