home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.religion.buddhism      All aspects of Buddhism as religion and      111,200 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 109,320 of 111,200   
   Wilson to Tang Huyen   
   Re: Debate?   
   23 Jul 16 14:53:17   
   
   XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: absfg_wilson@yahoo.com   
      
   On 7/23/2016 2:33 PM, Tang Huyen wrote:   
   > On 7/23/2016 10:59 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 7/23/2016 1:05 PM, brian mitchell wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Tang Huyen wrote:   
   >   
   >>>> There seems to be a clear distinction between saying   
   >>>> something in public, like on these boards, and charging   
   >>>> in unasked to dump hostile missives into somebody's   
   >>>> private e-mail box, specially on a repetitive basis.   
   >>>> The latter case is immoral and illegal, even if it may   
   >>>> take some financial and legal means to prosecute. It did   
   >>>> occur in tangent to these boards.   
   >   
   >>> The last paragraph goes off on a tangent particular to a   
   >>> specific case. The two modes of address the law prof   
   >>> identified can both takeb place in public. Posters to   
   >>> these NGs regularly flip-flop between public soap box   
   >>> and personal missive.   
   >   
   >> So I can call Tang names and get all in his face here, and   
   >> that's okay legally?  Well then!  :-)   
   >   
   > The distinction that is legally and morally relevant,   
   > to me, seems to be between the *place* of the comment.   
   > If it is on these boards, it is in public space, and   
   > people are free to express themselves. If somebody   
   > goes offboard to dump hostile missives into somebody   
   > else's private e-mail box, that is illegal and immoral.   
   >   
   > On these boards, surely, people can call Tang names   
   > and get all in his face here, and that's okay legally.   
   > Well then! I don't mind. Go ahead and have fun.   
   >   
   > There are special cases with VIPs: if you threaten   
   > somebody protected by the US Secret Service, like the   
   > President, on the Internet, you can be prosecuted,   
   > even if you claim that it is a joke. Even with   
   > non-VIPs, you should not make threats. They are not   
   > protected by freedom of speech. Again, threats were   
   > made in tangent to these boards, and they were made   
   > by unsolicited missives into people's private email   
   > boxes.   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >   
   > Tang Huyen   
      
   Sorry to hear about that.  Sending hate mail is not appropriate.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca