Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.buddhism    |    All aspects of Buddhism as religion and    |    111,200 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 109,580 of 111,200    |
|    Tang Huyen to Lee Dillion    |
|    Re: "Onanistic Science"    |
|    30 Aug 16 08:18:58    |
      XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen       From: tanghuyen@gmail.com              On 8/30/2016 7:24 AM, Lee Dillion wrote:              > In my own teaching experience, which has       > nothing to do with formal Buddhism, I have       > encountered a wide range of student abilities       > and receptiveness. A few fall at either ends       > of the spectrum – ones who really are quite       > hopeless in learning the doctrine and skills       > needed, and others who seem to possess       > both with ease and little needed prodding.       >       > For those in the vast area in between, I am       > egotistical enough to think I can       > assist – some through direct teaching, some       > through modeling behavior, but most by       > allowing them to get their hands dirty (and       > fingers stepped on occasionally) by direct       > practice, feedback, and, hopefully, reflection.       >       > Not sure how this maps to Zen, but I would       > like to think that not all is hopeless, even for       > the most of inept students. For them, at least,       > we could suggest another path.              Lee my sweet and loving son, paths themselves       are not hermetically sealed, and if somebody       discovers some path somewhere, somebody       else is going to discover the same, with at most       minor variations. In addition, paths famously       borrow from one another, and Chinese Chan       borrows massively from Daoism, almost en bloc.       As I often say, Madame Guyon and Fénelon       rediscover much of Buddhism and Daoism, at a       time and in a place where they are almost       unknown.              On top of that, there is the possibility that       underneath it all, the ultimate reference, the       rock bottom, may well be the human mind and       its patterns, in all their opacity and fluffiness, so       that under the proclamations of, say, the Book,       people can well practice the same methods       (Dharma-s) as in Buddhism, and attain to the       same results, more or less. The uncarved whole       can express itself in different manners ...              So, suggest another path can well be to       suggest another appearance to the same path,       more or less. Mindfulness, concentration,       detachment, equability, etc. It would be to       protect the innocent ...              Tang Huyen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca