Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.buddhism    |    All aspects of Buddhism as religion and    |    111,200 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 109,705 of 111,200    |
|    Tang Huyen to Ned Ludd    |
|    Re: Peace (was Re: Deepak Chopra on Trum    |
|    14 Sep 16 11:01:36    |
      XPost: alt.philosophy.zen, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.taoism       From: tanghuyen@gmail.com              On 9/14/2016 9:29 AM, Ned Ludd wrote:              > Not too bad a quote. Too bad you weren't there to help her       > get rid of all basis that she stands and depends upon.       >       > She tries to "undo everything to redo everything" to be "all new"       > so "no trace is left", and there "shall be in myself nothing fixed".       >       > Yet she does this firmly standing on "my God", whom she sees       > as a "destructive spirit" and origin of "your creature" (herself),       > in hopes that "I shall become in you" and "take in your hand       > all the forms that will be convenient to your intentions."       >       > This is a variant of the famous and widely quoted (often by       > scoundrels) Bible verse, "Thy will be done."       >       > Because everyone who has quoted "Thy will be done", or sought       > to empty themselves of everything to be "all new", has lurking in       > their little monkey brains a firm and unshakeable idea of what       > God is and what God wants. And therein lies all the sins of       > mankind and religion.              The quote is from Fénelon, so it should be "he".       But what he says is distilled from his teacher,       Madame Guyon, so the below applies to her also.              He has to deal with the Church, which is       breathing down his neck, to put it mildly, so       some masquerade is needed, but if "no trace is       left", and there "shall be in myself nothing       fixed", what footing does he need? The       openness, flexibility and plasticity, which he       preaches and (presumably) attains, scarcely       admit of any ground or abode. Perhaps he has       lurking in his little monkey brains a firm and       unshakeable idea of what God is and what God       wants, but if you read him, that idea of God has       not determination whatsoever. When he says "I       shall become in you" and "take in your hand all       the forms that will be convenient to your       intentions", he actually is talking about himself,       in closed circle, squirting out into himself and       oozing into existence as a creation of himself,       per the cycle of the Stoic God.              As to all the sins of mankind and religion, they       are as you take them. God has no power to       dictate them to you. It is like when a customer       walks into a bar and the barkeeper says:       "What is your poison?" You decide what your       poison is and drink it. It takes all kinds. The       sins that would damn you are also the sins       that would save you, they can go both ways,       and it all depends on how you take them. It       is not decided ahead of time. God's hand is       your hand.              Tang Huyen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca