XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
From: cuddly@mindless.com
On 9/14/2016 9:25 PM, noname wrote:
> Julian wrote:
>> On 14/09/2016 15:48, Tang Huyen wrote:
>>> On 9/13/2016 8:42 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>
>>>> The 1 in a million coincidences get noticed. The other 9999999 misses
>>>> aren't noticed.
>>>
>>> The random mutations that guide evolution
>>> roughly work on the same principle, that the
>>> 1 in a million mutations get noticed, and
>>> that the other 9999999 misses aren't noticed.
>>> Mother Nature notices that 1 in a million
>>> mutations offers some better chance at
>>> survival and even blossoming, and that the
>>> other 9999999 don't, or even can drive the
>>> species to the ground. Sometimes success
>>> can go wild and drive the species to the
>>> ground, like the armour plates of dinosaurs,
>>> or just the mere size of the whole animals, as
>>> some dinosaurs in South America rise to
>>> seven stories high and are essentially eating
>>> machines. Scientists (and not even scientists,
>>> but mere mortals) wonder how they can have
>>> sex.
>>>
>>> Mental culture and religion essentially work
>>> on the same principle, too, as 1 in a million
>>> strivers hit the jackpot, so to speak, and
>>> successfully start a trend in mental culture
>>> or a religion, like in Buddhism, Daoism,
>>> Jewish mythology, etc. Ditto for political
>>> leaders, like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler,
>>> Gandhi, Trump, etc. whilst the other
>>> 9999999 don't get any traction and instead
>>> drop into the dust bin of history.
>>>
>>> It's a brutal world.
>>
>> Same with artists/writers/musicians.
>>
>>
>
> How come I have to disagree with everything? It sucks.
>
> Yes, very few writers/musicians/artists survive, because most of them suck.
> There's nothing random about it. They suck because they aren't what
> they're trying to be. Writers who aren't writers are guys walking around
> with writers' block. Artists who aren't appreciated maybe aren't
> expressing themselves in a way people can relate to, or what they're
> expressing is just more whining like people are sick of. And lots of
> wannabe musicians don't want the music at all, they just want the money and
> the chicks.
>
> You can not succeed at something without commitment to what it is. People
> in "mental culture" think they're getting themselves all magicked-up, but
> they don't even know what "mental culture" means to anyone but the teacher
> trying to suck them in for a few dollars, or more students to advertise on
> their website, or whatever.
>
> It isn't a brutal world, at least that isn't what I'm seeing. I'm seeing
> that it seems brutal to people who are brutally stupid, who haven't learned
> to think, who are wandering around quoting this or that in hopes that
> somebody will post *anything* in response that makes some sense for a
> change.
>
> Whatever. If I just disappear one of these days, you'll never know whether
> I went off to do something else, or if these useless forums simply bored me
> to death.
>
I agree, commitment's the thing, but disagree otherwise about art that
sucks.
The time designated geniuses ruled the roost is over. Good artists
abound, more so than at any time in the past. Some of the best
contemporary French poetry I've come across was displayed on the screen
of my newsreader back 15 years ago, and not just from one or two
individuals. At least 4 or 5. Ditto, if one cares to look for art on
the web, in sites such as SoundCloud for music (and YouTube), and
DeviantArt for graphic arts. We're no slouch either on absfg. We've got
Ned's boxes, Kitty's oil paintings, Julian's diaries (and who knows what
else he has, apart from the grand Clown that adorns his wall).
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
