Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.buddhism    |    All aspects of Buddhism as religion and    |    111,200 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 109,962 of 111,200    |
|    {:-]))) to Tang    |
|    Re: No escape    |
|    10 Oct 16 10:31:23    |
      XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen       From: wudao@wuji.net              Tang wrote:       >On 10/3/2016 1:39 PM, Tang Huyen wrote:       >       >> Trump wears his heart on his sleeve when all is well.       >> Trump wears his nerves on his sleeve when not all       >> is well, e. g., when he feels provoked, for real or just       >> in his imagination. In both cases, he has no buffer       >> zone, and is driven by his wishes and desires, either       >> for stroking his ego or for patching it up when it gets       >> tattered. In both cases, he must have instant       >> gratification.       >       >Sorry for the self-follow,              Knot a problemo.              >but last evening's second debate       >confirms the above.              I heard one comment and left the room.       It reminded me too much of what goes on in Usenet.              But, here, in the crossposts, I write stuff in response.              Watching television, I could yell at the screen.              What's of interest to me, in saying that, is how telepathy       might actually enable someone to talk to someone on TV.       If all the stars lined up a rite.              It's very strange when that occurs.       At least it was, in my experience.               ... snip for brevity ...              >Trump has no escape from himself. He locks himself up       >tightly in the cage he has built for himself in his head,       >cage which he proudly carries around and flashes to       >everybody. He inadvertently has much to offer strivers in       >the Way, as he points to the direction to avoid at all costs.              If he gets elected he might offer even more to strivers.              Strivers is a word that coresponds well, with strivers.              Was an oxymoron your intention?              Or is that another of my misinterpretations?              When you write, strivers in the Way, are they, like       in the Way in the Way? Or are you speaking of being in the Way       of something else, like a train light at the end of a tunnel?              Mine eye seams confused as of latte.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca