XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: wudao@wuji.net   
      
   On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 20:23:20 -0000 (UTC), noname   
    wrote:   
      
   >dagnabit  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> "Ummmmmmm"  wrote in message news:ntf0lj$qe5$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>   
   >> On 10/10/2016 4:53 AM, dagnabit wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> "Ummmmmmm"  wrote in message news:nt6l7a$6c2$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>> absfg is so full of angels that it needs an idiot or two to redress   
   >>>> the cosmic balance.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> doubtful that absfg has either or, but might   
   >>> you expound on "cosmic balance"  for all of   
   >>> the kids in the cheap seats? thanks !   
   >>   
   >> Sorry, no.   
   >> I'm not an expounder.   
   >> It sounds like a joke to me.   
   >>   
   >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   
   >>   
   >> well you did mention "cosmic balance" and   
   >> to me I think that that sounds like a joke. can the   
   >> cosmos be unbalanced, and can an infinitesimal   
   >> slice of the cosmic cookie like man actually have   
   >> the power or the wherewithal to balance it somehow?   
   >>   
   >   
   >Yes, the cosmos can be unbalanced, in fact if it ever stops rebalancing   
   >itself, it might very well cease to exist.   
   >   
   >In an instrument of very high precision, like reality, it takes an   
   >extremely fine adjustment to keep the whole thing from grinding itself into   
   >a lump of slag.   
      
   One time the cosmos ate a gyro.   
      
   As it turned out, it turned in   
   to be very scopic as it spun round.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)