XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: wudao@wuji.net   
      
   noname wrote:   
   > {:-]))) had a theory:   
   >   
   >> The brian issue occurs when noname bottom-posts   
   >> in response to brian's posts.   
   >>   
   >> When noname responds in the middle of a brian-post,   
   >> those portions of his response get posted,   
   >> but when he tries to post at the bottom, he draws a blank.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Then why do my bottom-posts show up in replies to anyone else?  I'm averse   
   >to pushing issues, maybe that's a Taoist thang and I've caught a case of   
   >Taoism, WTF do I know about it?   
      
   Why did I write the word, averse,   
   in the last post, prior to reading that same word, just now?   
      
   Does the future not draw the present into its boat?   
      
   > Obviously it will work itself out as   
   >necessary, unless it is more necessary that it not, in which case it won't,   
   >and thereby will have.  NMP.   
      
   Obviously if you don't want to fix the problem   
   you'll keep on doing what you're doing.   
      
   There's a word for that.   
      
   Sometimes there is what's called   
   a work-around.   
      
   A patch, if you will.   
      
   - arghhh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)