XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: invalid@invalid.invalid   
      
   {:-])))  wrote:   
   > noname wrote:   
   >> {:-]))) had a theory:   
   >>   
   >>> The brian issue occurs when noname bottom-posts   
   >>> in response to brian's posts.   
   >>>   
   >>> When noname responds in the middle of a brian-post,   
   >>> those portions of his response get posted,   
   >>> but when he tries to post at the bottom, he draws a blank.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Then why do my bottom-posts show up in replies to anyone else?  I'm averse   
   >> to pushing issues, maybe that's a Taoist thang and I've caught a case of   
   >> Taoism, WTF do I know about it?   
   >   
   > Why did I write the word, averse,   
   > in the last post, prior to reading that same word, just now?   
      
   Unlike some, my memory structure does not treat every detail in the same   
   way.  The fastest storage only contains the most-used information.  Slower   
   storage contains archived information.  Expendable storage contains items   
   that remain in dispute regarding their truth.  Useless information doesn't   
   get stored at all, there's always plenty of useless information available   
   should I need some.  The reason you chose one word over another just ain't   
   mine to know at the moment; if it's necessary it will be issued to me, like   
   a soldier is issued a gun.  No point carrying around useless baggage.   
      
   >   
   > Does the future not draw the present into its boat?   
      
   That's the stupidest thing I've read for a while.  No, the future does not   
   draw the present into its boat, the future does not yet exist, so it can't   
   draw anything anywhere.  Until a universe becomes the present, its   
   existence in the future remains potential, possible.  The present emerges   
   from the well of possibilities people call the future.  It's like the well   
   of all concept except it's only the ones that can become manifest from the   
   current universe.   
      
   >   
   >> Obviously it will work itself out as   
   >> necessary, unless it is more necessary that it not, in which case it won't,   
   >> and thereby will have.  NMP.   
   >   
   > Obviously if you don't want to fix the problem   
   > you'll keep on doing what you're doing.   
   >   
   > There's a word for that.   
   >   
   > Sometimes there is what's called   
   > a work-around.   
   >   
   > A patch, if you will.   
   >   
   > - arghhh   
   >   
      
   Sometimes there is no problem to be solved, I find that happens quite often   
   while in the middle of next; there, there is only the doing of the   
   solution.   
      
   --   
   email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)