XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen
From: meanmrmustard@gmail.com
"Ned Ludd" wrote in message
news:5PmdnbzFHu_kW2LKnZ2dnUU7-VPNnZ2d@earthlink.com...
"Tang Huyen" wrote in message
news:e5edd2d8-2df0-bc7f-7375-af1c06922b3a@gmail.com...
> On 10/13/2016 9:18 AM, {:-]))) wrote:
>
>> Are you saying you don't want a Platonic relationship with dagnabit?
>>
>> Maybe I'm not quite understanding your point here.
>
> I have never known her anywhere else than on these boards. No
> e-mail, nothing in private. Below is a (somewhat chaotic) sample
> of her posts, from 2004, when she posted under the nym Dominic.
> Classic Jen stuff. I bow low to her profound insight. Many
> apologies to her for not having "got" her point back then, even
> intellectually alone.
>
> < clown acts in search of approval from cathode ray
> tubes, should i be expected to inflate their balloons
> for them?
>
> i can already see that that flower on your lapel simply
> squirts water.>>
>
> < triumvirate is so abyssmally infinitesimal in the cosmic chaotic
> scheme of things that any actions towards any type of discipline,
> philosophy or practice are going to have such a minute effect on
> a monumentally worthless insignificant insubstantial
> phenomenality that all efforts in this direction are infinitely
> hilarious and a complete waste of phenomenal time. there is no
> need to be or do anything. just be. being is utterly whole perfect
> and complete just as it is.>>
>
> < waste a lot of breath in propogating a system of wordmongered
> self disciplines and self aggrandizements
>
> how you can sit there and say that there should be no concern
> for self and the things of self and then wordstorm thousands of
> posts with quote after quote about the eightfold noble path is
> the height of contradiction hypocrisy and incongruency
>
> but that can be fun too>>
>
> < that's practicing it and what type of advantage can be said to
> effulge and to whom?
>
> the principles at play here, the consciousness and the
> energies which play out into multitudinous personalities and
> idiosyncracies are already perfect in their base design owing
> to the notion that they are a pale reflection of that one true
> prior most principle which is perfect whole and complete
> within itself, the ding an sich, the thing in and of itself, and
> nothing needs to be done to change it or to try to be something
> other than what you already are right now. that which is the
> creative principle cannot be changed anyway.
>
> the only thing that you could ever change is the false self, that
> which you identify yourself as, the body-mind-personality. why
> bother with all the practices and disciplines to alter something
> that is false and slippery to begin with? you only shift its
> falseness and slipperiness to a different channel.>>
>
> < simply be. stop trying to intellectualize that which is completely
> useless to begin with
> [snip]
> don't even begin to start with. you can't begin again if you
> never worry about starting anything up at all knowing full well
> that everything but everything is completely useless worthless
> and insignificant to begin with and all practices show what a
> fool one is for even trying to bring significance to utter
> insignificance.>>
>
> < heaven from hell
> blue skies from pain
> can you tell a green field
> from a cold steel rail
> a smile from a veil
> do you think you can tell
>
> and did they get you to trade
> your heroes for ghosts
> hot ashes for trees
> hot air for a cool breeze
> cold comfort for charge
> and did you exchange
> a walk on part in the war
> for a lead roll in a cage
>
> how i wish, how i wish you were here
> we're just two lost souls swimmin' in a fish bowl year after year,
> running over the same old ground what have we found, the
> same old fears wish you were here>>
>
> < order to be actualized and substantiated as such?
>
> are you enlightened? if not, second hand advice like this might
> actually foster a reverse effect and keep you from an ultimate
> expansion of your horizon of awareness. buddha appeared to
> be teaching for his day and the particular person or people
> sitting in front of him at the time. he also said that his words
> needed to be dropped ultimately, the story of the raft, and
> nisargadatta maharaj said the same thing, that his disciples
> would ultimately need to let go of his teachings since his words
> were like all other words, simply concepts in a conceptual
> realm where what he was attempting to describe was beyond
> or prior to words and concepts in a type of metanoesis d
> esignation, or beyond wisdom, as such.
> absolute reasoning defies logic. absolute reasoning defies
> reason.>>
>
> < might like to shimmer in resonant luminosity to the tune of
> changing what i appear to be into what i think i should appear
> to be, none of it, conceptual or cognizable, will be to any
> advantage except to that resonant luminosity and its survival
> agenda and strategy
>
> beneath it all, the subtle implicate order is perfect whole and
> complete in and of itself and needs no relative renditionalities
> to secure its place in the survival matrix it has identified with.
>
> there is nothing that you need to become or change yourself
> into. all that is needed is to recognize that you are not this
> body or its subsequent mind and personality and with this
> understanding comes a total freedom that is beyond
> description because this state is prior to designations, words
> and concepts.
>
> go right now to zero concepts. stay there.>>
>
> < bleed stream that fractals its depressurized enharmonic line
> fields to the tune of sineuous-synchrotropic vibratility which is
> behind itself looking into itself and fooling itself into thinking it
> is elsewise than what it really is.
>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
