XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen
From: meanmrmustard@gmail.com
"Tang Huyen" wrote in message
news:aeea9742-6d05-b9ae-af4a-b92ae05cc46a@gmail.com...
>
> On 10/14/2016 6:05 AM, {:-]))) wrote:
>
> > Reminds me of me, being here two play.
> > As the world, sewinging two-speak, otheringing.
> > Ping sounded good. Pong resounded as wells.
>
> Yesterday I quoted her:
>
> < awakening doofus>>
>
> She also said:
>
> < become enlightened, which many over time
> have seemed to do, but instead it would
> be to convincingly return one's self to one's
> relinqished ego and enjoy the human
> agenda of suffering in all its raging
> glory. this could preclude any need
> for anyone to bother becoming enlightened
> in the first place.>>
>
> < as samadhi. my thoughts stop, then my
> breathing and my heartbeat. nisargadatta
> maharaj said that samadhi was just another
> form of sleep. he states that the 'absolute'
> perspective is the ultimate state. i feel that
> i occasionally touch on this 'absolute'
> perspective.>>
>
> <>
>
> < other but *ME*.>>
>
> < should " I " go out of "my" way to avoid saying " I ". " I " would
> have to drop "me" and "my" too and communication would
> become even more cryptic from "yours truly" than it already is,
> so would you want that ? For me to speak in COMPLETELY
> impersonal terms ?" I " really don't think that "you're" ready for
> that yet.
> As to your other concepts, life and death, if your impression is
> that " I " fear either of them, then go ahead and entertain that
> concept too." I " guess " I'll " never get tired of saying that it is
> almost impossible for anyone to reach that prior to concepts
> state. All the words and all the ideas are simply conceptual
> entertainment and contain no ultimate meaning or value.>>
>
> <>
>
> < Judging piles on the emotional baggage to bolster the security,
> sensation and power addictions. Discernment allows for a
> gradual transition from what constricts awareness to what
> expands it.>>
>
> < way on their own path ? If your path were perfect and you were
> completely realized, this would still be no cause for you to stand
> in such adamant judgements of others. You think that your
> judgements define others but it just defines you as someone who
> has a deep emotional addiction to judgement. If you can ever get
> your nose out of the air and look around at the way things really
> are, and not how you are projecting your own dullness onto reality
> in exchange for the reality looking like you to you, and thus
> satisfying those emotional security and power addictions, you
> might actually appear humane to yourself and you might actually
> see that humane-ness is more of what this reality is rather than
> Tang-dullness.>>
>
> < radio stations that are programmed this way. There aren't really
> any DJ's present , it is all done by computer. But we know that
> Tang isn't just a cyber-ghost because why would anyone create
> such an obtuse, hebetudinous persona with such a bland psyche
> anyway ?>>
>
> < generous person I could, always trying to share, always trying to
> do for others with no thought of my own self gaining anything in
> the process. I think this sets the basis for a shift in awareness
> from a focus of worldly events processed through the senses to
> an inner aspect of intuitive understanding.
> Sometime in the 70's I had a massive shift in consciousMess that
> resulted in my speaking to everyone in stories and parables.
> People told me that I sounded just like Christ so I bought a Bible
> and read some of the words of Christ and it was as if I had written
> them myself. Before this shift in consciousMess I had never
> meditated or read any metaphysical books whatsoever but from
> somewhere inside there was a teacher who was revealing things
> to me. It wasn't a voice but subtle impressions that I had to pay
> very close attention to and try not to mix these messages with my
> own thought patterns. I had spontaneous doses of samadhi back
> then too but I didn't even know what it was at the time. This shift
> in consciousMess over the years has intensified to a point where I
> would come to a bliss state that was so powerful that I had to talk
> myself out of it because it would end up getting me in trouble
> because there was absolutely no fear of anything whatsoever and
> in that state you can hurt yourself physically but you don't care.
> Then in the early 80's one other massive shift in awareness
> occurred on top of an already deepening awareness over the
> years and a massive bliss attack was again underway with an
> aspect of knowledge pouring in which many of the things that I
> have come to understand still shouldn't be spoken of because of
> the nature of Jivas and their beliefs and such.
> Most Jivas have a tunnel vision that is easy to recognize and as
> such I have yet to find anyone face to face or here on the net that
> is at a concept-free level and can discuss these things that I have
> come to understand.>>
>
> < that arise in consciousness. You don't have consciousness,
> consciousness has many forms in which to express itself. All
> knowledge is there in your sense of conscious presence. It simply
> depends on a particular arena of focus for certain ideas to surface
> and to be claimed as individual.>>
>
> < possibly and potentially available in your sense of conscious
> presence. It is knowledge itself. Depending on the arena of focus
> that 'one' employs, any and all knowledge is available there. There
> are no individuals as such, but simply the process of
> consciousness in function. All there is, is consciousness. I make
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
