XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen
From: invalid@invalid.invalid
Kitty P wrote:
>
>
> "noname" wrote in message news:ntquq9$v7l$10@dont-email.me...
>
> Kitty P wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Wilson" wrote in message news:ntqgvn$cfv$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> On 10/14/2016 7:18 AM, Julian wrote:
>>> On 14/10/2016 12:00, liaM wrote:
>>>> On 10/14/2016 8:36 AM, noname wrote:
>>>>> Kitty P wrote:
>>>>>> "noname" wrote in message news:ntp2bk$koi$6@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kitty P wrote:
>>>>>>>> "noname" wrote in message news:ntodoe$8q9$6@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> dagnabit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Ned Ludd" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:pu2dnSimW7_mgGLKnZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Tang Huyen" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:eaa3691f-3775-5c70-5b47-b3af4d6a37ad@gmail.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/12/2016 8:07 PM, Ned Ludd wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Holy moly. So you want to grab women's breasts and put
>>>>>>>>>>>> your hand up their skirts?? (Mentally.) That's quite an
>>>>>>>>>>>> admission, even for a.b.s.f.g.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose it was only a matter of time. You can only stay
>>>>>>>>>>>> stoic up to a point. Then it all spews out. Like a late-term
>>>>>>>>>>>> volcano.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any more revelations?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "You can only stay stoic up to a point" should have been:
>>>>>>>>>>> "You can only stay platonic up to a point."
>>>>>>>>>>> Returning to your post, many women complain that men
>>>>>>>>>>> in authority (like professors and managers) figuratively
>>>>>>>>>>> strip them naked when ogling them up close.
>>>>>>>>>>> Tang Huyen
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But seriously, what do you think women want?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> security, protection and emotional satisfaction.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> These days that often includes every shiny thing that can be
>>>>>>>>> squeezed
>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> the credit-limit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> men just want to get their dicks wet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd say that's necessary-but-not-sufficient.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a great time reading what men think about women. The
>>>>>>>> fascination
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> me is that women aren't all the same and I read the generalizations
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> same good humor as when women talk as if all men are the same. Both
>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>> generalizations just aren't universally true in either case. For
>>>>>>>> example, if
>>>>>>>> dinky dunkin' were the only thing in men's motivations - things
>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>> pretty tense with mom, sis, aunties, daughters, and female friends.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I were to name something that I think most women want - it
>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>> simple kindness.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You don't mean actually caring enough that you're the fun part of his
>>>>>>> life,
>>>>>>> do you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't sleep much anymore. Seldom more than about 4 hours. Then I
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>> and do the next thing for a while. Around dawn when it's about time
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> the Old Woman to drag it out of bed (she's a 10-12-hour sleeper), I
>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> getting a huge erection right on my smile muscles cuz I've
>>>>>>> remembered that
>>>>>>> there's more to life than what doesn't include her.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can see there might not be a lot of kindness in her household.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought your vision was better. Sad sad.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It could be that your description of your old lady dragging it out of
>>>> bed was somewhat derogatory from a woman's point of view. Might be
>>>> of course this is your manner of being affectionate, uh? Just like
>>>> African Americans were reported to be calling each other "niggers" and
>>>> other racist expletives while love making, something that most white
>>>> anglo saxon prudes wouldn't understand. And when you start with
>>>> "getting a huge erection" upon remembering "that there's more to life
>>>> than what doesn't include her." - What the hell does that mean? That
>>>> you have your own life in which you really don't give a shit about
>>>> including her? Or what?
>>>
>>> More or less precisely the opposite.
>>>
>>> You are ignoring the key identifier with respect to what is erecting...
>>> his SMILE muscles.
>>>
>>> There is more to his, noname's, life than his interests in things
>>> that DON'T include his wife.
>>>
>>> I read it as an affectionate reference to his happiness
>>> when his wife wakes up in a morning.
>>
>>>> Likewise.
>>
>> The only person who really knows is his wife.
>>
>
>>> That strikes a middle ground between, unfortunate you don't know for sure
>>> which leg to stand on.
>
> Gosh - I didn't know it was an argument.
It can seem that way when one is on the defense.
> I don't like you - that's a fact.
I'm not surprised, and that's a fact too. I don't like The Church Lady,
never have, and don't want to see her skraggy ass on the pulpit in the
halls of state. Nor do I have much tolerance for its minions.
> But it isn't my business or anyone else other than you about how she,
> herself, feels. My deepest hope is that she is very happy actually!
>
I'm not sure what my deepest hope is, maybe for universal awakening, that
might be nice. For that matter I'd be very pleased if one day you
overthrow your Masters and think for your self, it only takes one
unawakened to tincture the toilet.
--
email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
