Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.buddhism    |    All aspects of Buddhism as religion and    |    111,200 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 110,173 of 111,200    |
|    {:-]))) to All    |
|    Re: Early Jen/dagnabit (was Re: Existent    |
|    14 Oct 16 15:30:05    |
      XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen       From: wudao@wuji.net              Tang had been presenting lots and lots of material from Jen:              >> if the basic consciousness didn't have that notion of 'i love' it wouldn't       >> keep coming back for more lifetime after lifetime in countless forms       >> if it really did indeed judge its life experiences to be 'suffering'.              Being totally involved can be what it takes       to be totally evolved if not totally uninvolved.              >> you may not think that suffering is enjoyable and you may keep       >> seeking out ways and means to end this suffering, but consciousness       >> itself is having a grand old time no matter what is occurring.              Sat Chit Ananda is a Hindu paradigm, and it works.       It wells enough of its wells to quench many a thirst.              >> this       >> seemingly divisional aspect of perception shows decidedly that 'you'       >> and the consciousness are indeed on differing wavelengths in that       >> what you consider suffering is what it considers a 'good time'.>>              The Self is able to play all parts, see out of all eyes, etc.              With Taoism, as a different paradigm, there is no Self.       No Brahman of any personal sort of Being who is experiencing.              Suffering and not-suffering, joy and no-joy, are mutual.              It is not necessarily the case, with Taoism, as I see the views       presented in so-called Taoist texts, that everything is fun, fun, fun       until daddy took the T-bird away and even then it was too.              Not quite, if even at all.              Among paradigms, some see them as all the same, in depth.              In the valley of the shadows, in death, some of them do part.              It's possible that the Chinese world-view and the Indian are       not exactly congruent in various aspects and experiences.              When someone finds Tao, follows Tao, is in harmony with Tao,       perhaps there is the Joy of the Zone, or maybe it is simply       going for a swim. Catching bugs. Or doing nothing.              Beyond, for a good time, call one eight hundred Self,       there could be said to be neither good nor bad.              And may be why Lao Tzu was not thrilled at the feast.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca