XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: cuddly@mindless.com   
      
   On 10/14/2016 5:49 PM, noname wrote:   
   > liaM  wrote:   
   >> On 10/14/2016 8:36 AM, noname wrote:   
   >>> Kitty P  wrote:   
   >>>> "noname"  wrote in message news:ntp2bk$koi$6@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Kitty P  wrote:   
   >>>>>> "noname"  wrote in message news:ntodoe$8q9$6@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> dagnabit  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Ned Ludd"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:pu2dnSimW7_mgGLKnZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@earthlink.com...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Tang Huyen"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:eaa3691f-3775-5c70-5b47-b3af4d6a37ad@gmail.com...   
   >>>>>>>>> On 10/12/2016 8:07 PM, Ned Ludd wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> Holy moly.  So you want to grab women's breasts and put   
   >>>>>>>>>> your hand up their skirts??  (Mentally.)  That's quite an   
   >>>>>>>>>> admission, even for a.b.s.f.g.   
   >>>>>>>>>> I suppose it was only a matter of time. You can only stay   
   >>>>>>>>>> stoic up to a point. Then it all spews out. Like a late-term   
   >>>>>>>>>> volcano.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Any more revelations?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "You can only stay stoic up to a point" should have been:   
   >>>>>>>>> "You can only stay platonic up to a point."   
   >>>>>>>>> Returning to your post, many women complain that men   
   >>>>>>>>> in authority (like professors and managers) figuratively   
   >>>>>>>>> strip them naked when ogling them up close.   
   >>>>>>>>> Tang Huyen   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> But seriously, what do you think women want?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> security, protection and emotional satisfaction.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> These days that often includes every shiny thing that can be squeezed   
   >>>>>>> into   
   >>>>>>> the credit-limit.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> men just want to get their dicks wet.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I'd say that's necessary-but-not-sufficient.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I have a great time reading what men think about women. The fascination   
   >>>>>> for   
   >>>>>> me is that women aren't all the same and I read the generalizations with   
   >>>>>> the   
   >>>>>> same good humor as when women talk as if all men are the same. Both   
   >>>>>> those   
   >>>>>> generalizations just aren't universally true in either case. For   
   >>>>>> example, if   
   >>>>>> dinky dunkin' were the only thing in men's motivations - things would be   
   >>>>>> pretty tense with mom, sis, aunties, daughters, and female friends.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If I were to name something that I think most women want - it would be   
   >>>>>> simple kindness.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You don't mean actually caring enough that you're the fun part of his   
   >>>>> life,   
   >>>>> do you?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I don't sleep much anymore.  Seldom more than about 4 hours.  Then I get   
   >>>>> up   
   >>>>> and do the next thing for a while.  Around dawn when it's about time for   
   >>>>> the Old Woman to drag it out of bed (she's a 10-12-hour sleeper), I start   
   >>>>> getting a huge erection right on my smile muscles cuz I've remembered   
   that   
   >>>>> there's more to life than what doesn't include her.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I can see there might not be a lot of kindness in her household.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I thought your vision was better. Sad sad.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> It could be that your description of your old lady dragging it out of   
   >> bed was somewhat derogatory from a woman's point of view.  Might be   
   >> of course this is your manner of being affectionate, uh?   
   >   
   > I'm an old man, she's an old woman, we both think it's humorous that we can   
   > now play the "oh my i am old and lame and stupid and don't remember shit"   
   > card and get away with it, because, you know, we're old now.  It's a hoot.   
   > Sometimes we walk toward each other like cuckoo-clock people when the hour   
   > rings, then hug and crack up.  Maybe living at high altitude has twiddled   
   > our humor zones here and there, inspired a few brain defects, that kinda   
   > thing.   
   >   
   >> Just like   
   >> African Americans were reported to be calling each other "niggers" and   
   >> other racist expletives while love making, something that most white   
   >> anglo saxon prudes wouldn't understand.   
   >   
   > Can't really comment on that, i've never been a fly on that wall.  As I   
   > remember, all the black folks I've run into had more interesting things to   
   > do than hang out with some white geek.  Not counting the ones I've run into   
   > late at night in places no sane whitey would go, who were just folks with   
   > whom I shared a perspective.  I'm pretty sure that cats also yowl and carry   
   > on when they make love, whatever floats their boat is their deal.   
   >   
   >> And when you start with   
   >> "getting a huge erection" upon remembering "that there's more to life   
   >> than what doesn't include her."  - What the hell does that mean?   
   >   
   > You have trouble with double-negatives too?  Some do, some don't.  Note   
   > that I get a huge erection OF MY SMILE MUSCLES.  Like Kitty, your brain has   
   > been programmed to turn off when it encounters certain phrases and   
   > concepts.  Maybe I'm just some old drunk programmer who gave it up for   
   > deprogramming and booze, who's to know?   
   >   
   >> That   
   >> you have your own life in which you really don't give a shit about   
   >> including her? Or what?   
   >>   
   >   
   > It means that there ain't no sunshine when she's gone, just the next thing,   
   > which isn't all that bad, but without her there's hardly any sunshine, it's   
   > just next-thing, not fun or unfun, but kind of empty.   
   >   
   > You know the old pave-parking-lot song, don't know what you've got until   
   > it's gone; she came within an inch of dying last year, and I had a few days   
   > without her while she was in the hospital; before then I'd been too busy   
   > living the life and raising kids and getting over parenthood trauma to   
   > grasp the depth of my love for her.   
   >   
   > Now here I am, in a newsgroup where people supposedly think about things,   
   > and I find people who think exactly as they've been taught, in the most   
   > politically-correct manner, which seems really close to not-at-all.   
   >   
      
      
      
   Ok. Thanks for the explanation. I think you're a bit off the mark with   
   your accusation of Kitty and I blinded because of some conditioning.   
   The accusation says more about you than it does about us.  But that's   
   neither here or there. Kitty and I are not unaware robots.  As I see it,   
   our misunderstanding of your comments are a direct consequence of the   
   ellipsistical (check the word) manner you choose often to express   
   yourself.  You toss phrases such as your famous "huge erection OF MY   
   SMILE MUSCLES" with such relish, are you peeing in the pool to see   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)