XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen
From: invalid@invalid.invalid
dagnabit wrote:
> "Tang Huyen" wrote in message
> news:85724f2c-4545-882e-aaa7-977199a4778b@gmail.com...
>>
>> On 10/20/2016 8:52 AM, dagnabit wrote:
>>
>>> "noname"
>>
>>>> I think the proper tense is "must have been". Everything that is, must
>>>> have been necessary. Otherwise the case would have been, that what is,
>>>> would have turned out some other way, because that other way, was more
>>>> necessary.
>>
>>> then your notion of must bes must be the most necessary must be unless
>>> of course you change
>>> your mind and find a more necessary must be to
>>> replace previous must bes due to some prioritized
>>> necessity and that would mean that any previous
>>> certitude as to the necessitation of specific must bes must be
>>> unnecessary.
>>> see how human logic can be a rut loop of unnecessary
>>> must be conundrumisms and that must be the easiest
>>> way to show that must bes must be flexibly necessitated?
>>
>> Jen chérie, You are back with your famous circular
>> logic, which can tie logicians up in self-circling
>> knots. Keep up the good work.
>>
>> Tang Huyen
>
> that's how logic and intellect operate. ask what a certain
> concept means and you simply get more concepts until
> finally you make it back again to the first concept, and
> that's the must be of all must bes.
>
>
>
>
>
The trick is recognizing the first concept. Not such a trick if you're
working your way up the logic tree from where you are. First-concept is
truth, binary, true-or-false, is-or-ain't. But maybe that's too far up the
tree.
--
email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
