XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: invalid@invalid.invalid   
      
   dagnabit  wrote:   
   > "noname"  wrote in message news:nub2cc$lg5$3@dont-email.me...   
   >>   
   >> dagnabit  wrote:   
   >>> "Tang Huyen"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:85724f2c-4545-882e-aaa7-977199a4778b@gmail.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On 10/20/2016 8:52 AM, dagnabit wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "noname"   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> I think the proper tense is "must have been".  Everything that is,   
   >>>>>> must   
   >>>>>> have been necessary.  Otherwise the case would have been, that what   
   >>>>>> is,   
   >>>>>> would have turned out some other way, because that other way, was   
   >>>>>> more   
   >>>>>> necessary.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> then your notion of must bes must be the most necessary must be unless   
   >>>>> of course you change   
   >>>>> your mind and find a more necessary must be to   
   >>>>> replace previous must bes due to some prioritized   
   >>>>> necessity and that would mean that any previous   
   >>>>> certitude as to the necessitation of specific must bes must be   
   >>>>> unnecessary.   
   >>>>> see how human logic can be a rut loop of unnecessary   
   >>>>> must be conundrumisms and that must be the easiest   
   >>>>> way to show that must bes must be flexibly necessitated?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Jen chérie, You are back with your famous circular   
   >>>> logic, which can tie logicians up in self-circling   
   >>>> knots. Keep up the good work.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Tang Huyen   
   >>>   
   >>> that's how logic and intellect operate. ask what a certain   
   >>> concept means and you simply get more concepts until   
   >>> finally you make it back again to the first concept, and   
   >>> that's the must be of all must bes.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> The trick is recognizing the first concept.  Not such a trick if you're   
   >> working your way up the logic tree from where you are.  First-concept is   
   >> truth, binary, true-or-false, is-or-ain't.  But maybe that's too far up   
   >> the   
   >> tree.   
   >>   
   >> --   
   >> email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com   
   >   
   > if that's a dogwood tree don't bark   
   > because you'll just confuse it.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   You know, I haven't been east of the Mississippi since maybe 1964, and I   
   never did learn the names of various trees when we lived in Ohio or Indiana   
   or Michigan for a time, it was quicktime-tour to wherever the next   
   construction job was rumored to be.  I wouldn't know a dogwood tree if it   
   bit my ankle.  LOL, I've probably forgotten what poison-oak and its kin   
   look like, but I know some about aspen and pine and spruce, if I'm lucky.   
      
   --   
   email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)