XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: meanmrmustard@gmail.com   
      
   "Kitty P"  wrote in message news:nvq0bd$bjp$1@dont-email.me...   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > "Julian"  wrote in message news:nvpucn$4ot$1@dont-email.me...   
   >   
   > On 07/11/2016 13:54, Wilson wrote:   
   > > On 11/6/2016 4:42 PM, Kitty P wrote:   
   > >> "noname"  wrote in message news:nvo0tp$neb$1@dont-email.me...   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Nobody in Particular  wrote:   
   > >>> > On 11/6/2016 12:15 AM, noname wrote:   
   > >>> >> liaM  wrote:   
   > >>> >>> On 11/5/2016 8:54 PM, noname wrote:   
   > >>> >>   
   > >>> >> What I think is that You People don't recognize just how sexist   
   > >>> Kitty's   
   > >>> >> comments about how "men don't understand" are.  Kitty is the most   
   > >>> blatantly   
   > >>> >> sexist individual posting in these groups.   
   > >>> >>   
   > >>> >> As for whatever you think is "for your own good", you seem to   
   > >>> think you   
   > >>> >> have some special secret to impart but you apparently lack the   
   > >>> >> forthrightness to say what it is.  To me that screams "bullshit",   
   > >>> it says   
   > >>> >> you're hiding behind your egocentric paternalism and attempting to   
   > >>> assume   
   > >>> >> an aspect of superiority to make the magnifying glass go away.   
   > >>> Bring it   
   > >>> >> out and put it on the table, or admit that you shot your mouth off   
   > >>> about   
   > >>> >> nothing just to make yourself feel better.   
   > >>> >   
   > >>> > Why do you try so very hard to be offended?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Is there something in that for me?  What's my cut?  I'm not seeing it   
   > >>> as   
   > >>> having any benefit whatsoever. Why do you think I try to be offended?   
   > >>> Because people who theoretically are interested in "mental culture"   
   > >>> show   
   > >>> themselves to be dilettantes?  That's a personal issue, they can   
   > >>> pretend   
   > >>> whatever they want and put it over on themselves, not my problem.  On   
   > >>> the   
   > >>> other hand, those genuinely involved in the subject might wish to be   
   > >>> reminded that they've forgotten.  Do You People have a list of the   
   > >>> serious   
   > >>> and the list of those who are present merely to think well of   
   > >>> themselves by   
   > >>> association?  I missed that memo, please do forward it.   
   > >>   
   > >>> email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com   
   > >>   
   > >> Hello wall.   
   > >   
   > > According to widely accepted contemporary correct-thinking dogma it's   
   > > all but impossible for a woman to be sexist when she generalizes about   
   > > men.   
   > >   
   > > That's because, according to this mythology, men are generally   
   > > reprobates.  Anything you say about them is probably true.  And even if   
   > > it's not true specifically, it almost certainly is overall.  So it's   
   > > okay to say things about men that if they were said about women would   
   > > get one thrown into a metaphorical feminist gulag.   
   > >   
   > > The idea that Kitty saying, "That is the mistake that men make all the   
   > > time" might be a little bit sexist is simply flying over the heads of   
   > > Kitty and NiP.   
   > >   
   > > They can't believe it's even a little bit off kilter for a woman to   
   > > generalize like that.   
   > >   
   > > That's the world they have built around themselves.   
   >   
   > >>Are you saying they've taken over the roles Robert and Evelyn   
   > >>used to play in this theater?   
   >   
   > Really?  So it's time for a poll.  If being honest, what's the first thing   
   > that comes into your heads when you read or hear the word warrior?   
      
   those rare fellatio obsessed amazon women?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)