XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen
From: julianlzb87@gmail.com
On 07/11/2016 15:17, dagnabit wrote:
> "Kitty P" wrote in message news:nvq0bd$bjp$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>>
>> "Julian" wrote in message news:nvpucn$4ot$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> On 07/11/2016 13:54, Wilson wrote:
>> > On 11/6/2016 4:42 PM, Kitty P wrote:
>> >> "noname" wrote in message news:nvo0tp$neb$1@dont-email.me...
>> >>>
>> >>> Nobody in Particular wrote:
>> >>> > On 11/6/2016 12:15 AM, noname wrote:
>> >>> >> liaM wrote:
>> >>> >>> On 11/5/2016 8:54 PM, noname wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> What I think is that You People don't recognize just how sexist
>> >>> Kitty's
>> >>> >> comments about how "men don't understand" are. Kitty is the most
>> >>> blatantly
>> >>> >> sexist individual posting in these groups.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> As for whatever you think is "for your own good", you seem to
>> >>> think you
>> >>> >> have some special secret to impart but you apparently lack the
>> >>> >> forthrightness to say what it is. To me that screams "bullshit",
>> >>> it says
>> >>> >> you're hiding behind your egocentric paternalism and attempting to
>> >>> assume
>> >>> >> an aspect of superiority to make the magnifying glass go away.
>> >>> Bring it
>> >>> >> out and put it on the table, or admit that you shot your mouth off
>> >>> about
>> >>> >> nothing just to make yourself feel better.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Why do you try so very hard to be offended?
>> >>>
>> >>> Is there something in that for me? What's my cut? I'm not seeing
>> it >>> as
>> >>> having any benefit whatsoever. Why do you think I try to be offended?
>> >>> Because people who theoretically are interested in "mental
>> culture" >>> show
>> >>> themselves to be dilettantes? That's a personal issue, they can
>> >>> pretend
>> >>> whatever they want and put it over on themselves, not my problem. On
>> >>> the
>> >>> other hand, those genuinely involved in the subject might wish to be
>> >>> reminded that they've forgotten. Do You People have a list of the
>> >>> serious
>> >>> and the list of those who are present merely to think well of
>> >>> themselves by
>> >>> association? I missed that memo, please do forward it.
>> >>
>> >>> email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com
>> >>
>> >> Hello wall.
>> >
>> > According to widely accepted contemporary correct-thinking dogma it's
>> > all but impossible for a woman to be sexist when she generalizes
>> about > men.
>> >
>> > That's because, according to this mythology, men are generally
>> > reprobates. Anything you say about them is probably true. And even if
>> > it's not true specifically, it almost certainly is overall. So it's
>> > okay to say things about men that if they were said about women would
>> > get one thrown into a metaphorical feminist gulag.
>> >
>> > The idea that Kitty saying, "That is the mistake that men make all the
>> > time" might be a little bit sexist is simply flying over the heads of
>> > Kitty and NiP.
>> >
>> > They can't believe it's even a little bit off kilter for a woman to
>> > generalize like that.
>> >
>> > That's the world they have built around themselves.
>>
>> >>Are you saying they've taken over the roles Robert and Evelyn
>> >>used to play in this theater?
>>
>> Really? So it's time for a poll. If being honest, what's the first
>> thing that comes into your heads when you read or hear the word warrior?
>
> those rare fellatio obsessed amazon women?
Hey! I resemble that remark.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
