XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen
From: julianlzb87@gmail.com
On 07/11/2016 16:42, Kitty P wrote:
>
>
> "Julian" wrote in message news:nvq1ql$gq5$1@dont-email.me...
>
> On 07/11/2016 14:42, Kitty P wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Julian" wrote in message news:nvpucn$4ot$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>> On 07/11/2016 13:54, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 11/6/2016 4:42 PM, Kitty P wrote:
>>>> "noname" wrote in message news:nvo0tp$neb$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody in Particular wrote:
>>>>> > On 11/6/2016 12:15 AM, noname wrote:
>>>>> >> liaM wrote:
>>>>> >>> On 11/5/2016 8:54 PM, noname wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> What I think is that You People don't recognize just how sexist
>>>>> Kitty's
>>>>> >> comments about how "men don't understand" are. Kitty is the most
>>>>> blatantly
>>>>> >> sexist individual posting in these groups.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> As for whatever you think is "for your own good", you seem to
>>>>> think you
>>>>> >> have some special secret to impart but you apparently lack the
>>>>> >> forthrightness to say what it is. To me that screams "bullshit",
>>>>> it says
>>>>> >> you're hiding behind your egocentric paternalism and attempting to
>>>>> assume
>>>>> >> an aspect of superiority to make the magnifying glass go away.
>>>>> Bring it
>>>>> >> out and put it on the table, or admit that you shot your mouth off
>>>>> about
>>>>> >> nothing just to make yourself feel better.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Why do you try so very hard to be offended?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there something in that for me? What's my cut? I'm not seeing
>>>>> it as
>>>>> having any benefit whatsoever. Why do you think I try to be offended?
>>>>> Because people who theoretically are interested in "mental culture"
>>>>> show
>>>>> themselves to be dilettantes? That's a personal issue, they can
>>>>> pretend
>>>>> whatever they want and put it over on themselves, not my problem. On
>>>>> the
>>>>> other hand, those genuinely involved in the subject might wish to be
>>>>> reminded that they've forgotten. Do You People have a list of the
>>>>> serious
>>>>> and the list of those who are present merely to think well of
>>>>> themselves by
>>>>> association? I missed that memo, please do forward it.
>>>>
>>>>> email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Hello wall.
>>>
>>> According to widely accepted contemporary correct-thinking dogma it's
>>> all but impossible for a woman to be sexist when she generalizes about
>>> men.
>>>
>>> That's because, according to this mythology, men are generally
>>> reprobates. Anything you say about them is probably true. And even if
>>> it's not true specifically, it almost certainly is overall. So it's
>>> okay to say things about men that if they were said about women would
>>> get one thrown into a metaphorical feminist gulag.
>>>
>>> The idea that Kitty saying, "That is the mistake that men make all the
>>> time" might be a little bit sexist is simply flying over the heads of
>>> Kitty and NiP.
>>>
>>> They can't believe it's even a little bit off kilter for a woman to
>>> generalize like that.
>>>
>>> That's the world they have built around themselves.
>>
>>>> Are you saying they've taken over the roles Robert and Evelyn
>>>> used to play in this theater?
>>
>> Really? So it's time for a poll. If being honest, what's the first
>> thing that comes into your heads when you read or hear the word warrior?
>
>>> http://image.shutterstock.com/z/stock-photo--d-rendering-ama
on-warrior-with-spear-62434693.jpg
>>>
>
> Good one heh
Actually that was my second thought but my wife vetoed her picture.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
