XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen
From: invalid@invalid.invalid
Kitty P wrote:
>
>
> "Julian" wrote in message news:nvpucn$4ot$1@dont-email.me...
>
> On 07/11/2016 13:54, Wilson wrote:
>> On 11/6/2016 4:42 PM, Kitty P wrote:
>>> "noname" wrote in message news:nvo0tp$neb$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>> Nobody in Particular wrote:
>>>>> On 11/6/2016 12:15 AM, noname wrote:
>>>>>> liaM wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/5/2016 8:54 PM, noname wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I think is that You People don't recognize just how sexist
>>>> Kitty's
>>>>>> comments about how "men don't understand" are. Kitty is the most
>>>> blatantly
>>>>>> sexist individual posting in these groups.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for whatever you think is "for your own good", you seem to
>>>> think you
>>>>>> have some special secret to impart but you apparently lack the
>>>>>> forthrightness to say what it is. To me that screams "bullshit",
>>>> it says
>>>>>> you're hiding behind your egocentric paternalism and attempting to
>>>> assume
>>>>>> an aspect of superiority to make the magnifying glass go away.
>>>> Bring it
>>>>>> out and put it on the table, or admit that you shot your mouth off
>>>> about
>>>>>> nothing just to make yourself feel better.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you try so very hard to be offended?
>>>>
>>>> Is there something in that for me? What's my cut? I'm not seeing it as
>>>> having any benefit whatsoever. Why do you think I try to be offended?
>>>> Because people who theoretically are interested in "mental culture" show
>>>> themselves to be dilettantes? That's a personal issue, they can pretend
>>>> whatever they want and put it over on themselves, not my problem. On
>>>> the
>>>> other hand, those genuinely involved in the subject might wish to be
>>>> reminded that they've forgotten. Do You People have a list of the
>>>> serious
>>>> and the list of those who are present merely to think well of
>>>> themselves by
>>>> association? I missed that memo, please do forward it.
>>>
>>>> email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Hello wall.
>>
>> According to widely accepted contemporary correct-thinking dogma it's
>> all but impossible for a woman to be sexist when she generalizes about
>> men.
>>
>> That's because, according to this mythology, men are generally
>> reprobates. Anything you say about them is probably true. And even if
>> it's not true specifically, it almost certainly is overall. So it's
>> okay to say things about men that if they were said about women would
>> get one thrown into a metaphorical feminist gulag.
>>
>> The idea that Kitty saying, "That is the mistake that men make all the
>> time" might be a little bit sexist is simply flying over the heads of
>> Kitty and NiP.
>>
>> They can't believe it's even a little bit off kilter for a woman to
>> generalize like that.
>>
>> That's the world they have built around themselves.
>
>>> Are you saying they've taken over the roles Robert and Evelyn
>>> used to play in this theater?
>
> Really? So it's time for a poll. If being honest, what's the first thing
> that comes into your heads when you read or hear the word warrior?
>
>
Protective armor borne unnecessarily and by intent to a place where
conflict determines nothing.
Soldiers are needed in time of war. When they come home they become
farmers or warriors once more.
The Taoist sage walks unprotected, relying on his harmony with Tao, to
protect him or destroy him, as befits the nature of his true self. There's
a verse somewhere in the TTC about rhinos ignoring Mr Magoo, but nobody
except Jay ever reads that shit anyway and he has it memorized, if you care
maybe it's 50 or not. There's a verse or two in the Bible for Christian
types, but I don't remember that reference number either. References don't
mean jack shit anyway, it's the truth that's true, whatever the ruler says,
if it doesn't fit it just don't fit.
--
email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
