XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: invalid@invalid.invalid   
      
   dagnabit  wrote:   
   > "liaM"  wrote in message news:nvq5tn$qi$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>   
   >> On 11/7/2016 3:06 PM, dagnabit wrote:   
   >>> if true   
   >>> nature could be added to or subtracted from, it wouldn't be   
   >>> the real.   
   >>   
   >> Resembles St. Anselm's proof of the existence of god.  If god did not   
   >> exist, he wouldn't be perfect.  Being perfect, he exists.   
   >   
   > methinks that god's existence is somewhat removed   
   > from what we generaly think of as existence.   
      
   Methinks you are seeing the elephant where it can all be seen, thus unable   
   to see the tiny fleas hidden by their very size, and therefore unable to   
   observe the way they are all dancing to the same tune in time with one   
   another, and how the elephant is likewise dancing, on a larger harmonic, to   
   identical music, because they are all one thing behind the place their   
   skins grow from.  Man is likewise removed from what men think of as   
   existence.  It's the thinking-of that shapes existence, modern utopia or   
   verdant fields and streams of old.   
      
   > like in   
   > vedic cosmogony where they describe the earth as   
   > flat, yet we still see it as a globe, and this is "explained"   
   > as hyper-dimensionality wherein something can exist   
   > in differing aspects of attributable containment.  in   
   > god's existence, the view from our armchair may be   
   > described as non-linear or non-local, yet god is also   
   > described as being transcendent yet immanent too.   
   >   
   >   
      
   Think about 'pantheism' for a while, in literal terms.   
      
   --   
   email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)