XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: kittyp2060@hotmail.com   
      
   "Wilson"  wrote in message news:nvq9jo$f2m$1@dont-email.me...   
      
   On 11/7/2016 8:42 AM, Kitty P wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > "Julian"  wrote in message news:nvpucn$4ot$1@dont-email.me...   
   >   
   > On 07/11/2016 13:54, Wilson wrote:   
   >> On 11/6/2016 4:42 PM, Kitty P wrote:   
   >>> "noname"  wrote in message news:nvo0tp$neb$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Nobody in Particular  wrote:   
   >>>> > On 11/6/2016 12:15 AM, noname wrote:   
   >>>> >> liaM  wrote:   
   >>>> >>> On 11/5/2016 8:54 PM, noname wrote:   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> What I think is that You People don't recognize just how sexist   
   >>>> Kitty's   
   >>>> >> comments about how "men don't understand" are.  Kitty is the most   
   >>>> blatantly   
   >>>> >> sexist individual posting in these groups.   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> As for whatever you think is "for your own good", you seem to   
   >>>> think you   
   >>>> >> have some special secret to impart but you apparently lack the   
   >>>> >> forthrightness to say what it is.  To me that screams "bullshit",   
   >>>> it says   
   >>>> >> you're hiding behind your egocentric paternalism and attempting to   
   >>>> assume   
   >>>> >> an aspect of superiority to make the magnifying glass go away.   
   >>>> Bring it   
   >>>> >> out and put it on the table, or admit that you shot your mouth off   
   >>>> about   
   >>>> >> nothing just to make yourself feel better.   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > Why do you try so very hard to be offended?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Is there something in that for me?  What's my cut?  I'm not seeing   
   >>>> it as   
   >>>> having any benefit whatsoever. Why do you think I try to be offended?   
   >>>> Because people who theoretically are interested in "mental culture"   
   >>>> show   
   >>>> themselves to be dilettantes?  That's a personal issue, they can   
   >>>> pretend   
   >>>> whatever they want and put it over on themselves, not my problem.  On   
   >>>> the   
   >>>> other hand, those genuinely involved in the subject might wish to be   
   >>>> reminded that they've forgotten.  Do You People have a list of the   
   >>>> serious   
   >>>> and the list of those who are present merely to think well of   
   >>>> themselves by   
   >>>> association?  I missed that memo, please do forward it.   
   >>>   
   >>>> email: noname.1234567.abcdef@gmail.com   
   >>>   
   >>> Hello wall.   
   >>   
   >> According to widely accepted contemporary correct-thinking dogma it's   
   >> all but impossible for a woman to be sexist when she generalizes about   
   >> men.   
   >>   
   >> That's because, according to this mythology, men are generally   
   >> reprobates.  Anything you say about them is probably true.  And even if   
   >> it's not true specifically, it almost certainly is overall.  So it's   
   >> okay to say things about men that if they were said about women would   
   >> get one thrown into a metaphorical feminist gulag.   
   >>   
   >> The idea that Kitty saying, "That is the mistake that men make all the   
   >> time" might be a little bit sexist is simply flying over the heads of   
   >> Kitty and NiP.   
   >>   
   >> They can't believe it's even a little bit off kilter for a woman to   
   >> generalize like that.   
   >>   
   >> That's the world they have built around themselves.   
   >   
   >>> Are you saying they've taken over the roles Robert and Evelyn   
   >>> used to play in this theater?   
   >   
   > Really?  So it's time for a poll.  If being honest, what's the first   
   > thing that comes into your heads when you read or hear the word warrior?   
      
   >>Nice sidestep Kitty dear.   
      
   >>Good lord. I am starting to remind myself of Tang.   
      
   He must have tossed a fooking ninja star your way or something.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)