Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.buddhism    |    All aspects of Buddhism as religion and    |    111,200 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 110,673 of 111,200    |
|    Tang Huyen to All    |
|    Levity (was Re: Hits)    |
|    13 Nov 16 12:33:30    |
      XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen       From: tanghuyen@gmail.com              On 11/12/2016 7:13 PM, awaken21 wrote:              > Words of the masters still have the context of the       > circumstances of the moment in which they were       > uttered, something masters are one with.              As present-day aspirants, should we try to replicate       being one with the old masters in the circumstances       of the moment in which their words were uttered?       Or should we try to just be one with the circumstances       of our moment? If the former, are we trying to relive a       long gone moment, like a dead insect pinned on the       wall of some museum? If the latter, do we need the       context of the circumstances of the moment in which       the masters uttered their words?              Are we trying to fit into an ancient context, with exotic       overtones all around? Or are we trying to be free? If       the former, we would be merely antiquarians with       voyeuristic tendencies. If the latter, we would shed       everything and live in the moment, in the here and now,       with everything else sloughed off, floating around like a       butterfly in the golden breeze of Autumn.              Of course, it can be argued that we take a ride on the       freedom of the old masters by way of their recorded       words and gestures, and try to bring back their       freedom to life in our flesh and blood lives. But       precisely, their freedom freed them from whatever their       milieu was, so why would we need to recreate their       scenery, right down to the last comma?              Of course, to wish for freedom does not make it so, and       it still takes long and hard work, with no guarantee of       success, but we can just be mindful, which means being       mindful of ourselves in our circumstances, whatever       they are or are not, and be one with them, which means       dropping all identifications with anything and anybody,       ourselves included. If so, why do we need the context of       the circumstances of the moment in which the masters       uttered their words? Why load ourselves up on it, just       when we try to unload everything and be free? Should       we not travel light? (All the usual disclaimers ...)              Tang Huyen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca