XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: wudao@wuji.net   
      
   Ned wrote:   
   > brian wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> But he doesn't mention thought and how it generates interiority.   
   >> I could come and go with the wind  "...but that I have dreams..."   
   >>   
   >   
   >  If the eye does not sleep, all dreaming ceases naturally. To use   
   >thought to devise thoughts, what's more misguided than this?   
      
   Goblet words are refills of unlimited supplies of the unlimited.   
   In the Zz there is made mention of various sorts of sorts.   
      
   >Ignorance creates rest and unrest; wisdom neither loves nor   
   >hates. All that belongs to the two extremes is inference falsely   
   >drawn - a dream-phantom, a flower in the air.  Why strive to   
   >grasp it in the hand?   
      
   Seeing as how the texts and tales do go about undoing   
   what was often done by words in the first place   
   in the striving to grasp it one may learn   
   to unlearn and find nothing.   
      
   Eventually, wu-wei occurs.   
      
   - in theory as wells as in practices   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)