Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.buddhism    |    All aspects of Buddhism as religion and    |    111,200 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 110,710 of 111,200    |
|    {:-]))) to Tang    |
|    Re: Virgin (was Re: Levity)    |
|    16 Nov 16 14:00:00    |
      XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen       From: wudao@wuji.net              Tang wrote:       > Lee Dillion wrote:       >       >> It would seem that, over the years, you have attempted       >> to explain "pure reason, in the strict Kantian sense"       >> and how it relates to Buddhism and Stoicism. Being the       >> dullards that we are, you should try some more.       >       >I admit that I talk about it without explaining it,       >without even giving the gist of it, even when       >Brian poked me on it, so I have been cheap and       >reticent. On the Daoist board, pi and JayLo       >(perhaps also noname, though I am not sure       >about him) talk constantly about paradigms,       >paradigmatic forms, and paradigm shifts, along       >with axioms and all that good stuff, but they,       >whether they are scholars or not, are plainly       >groping in the dark, just like the white scholars       >in the humanities.              When someone is blind, to say what others are doing       might be to speak of that which one does not know.              >It is just like in mental culture, as JayLo keeps       >saying, what is instantly seen by the (supposed)       >awakeneds is very hard for the non-awakened       >to have any glimmer of, even intellectually.              And yet, a non-awakened, such as Tang, may say       what the white scholars and others are doing.              There's a saying that says something about that.              >So       >the stuff from LZ and ZZ that JayLo quotes       >profusely is packed choke-full with all the above       >good stuff, which is what forms and structures it       >wall to wall, yet the quoter himself (to me)       >scarcely has any idea about the axiomatic or       >paradigmatic form of what he quotes (though I       >am very grateful for his meaty and fascinating       >quotes, as I have hardly the time and resource       >to explore the authors quoted, and in very       >interesting cases, I can look up the Chinese).              Taoism rings bells in my mind and I chime in at times.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca