XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.philosophy.zen   
   From: meanmrmustard@gmail.com   
      
   "Ned Ludd"  wrote in message   
   news:fJ-dnRBIu_5zJa7FnZ2dnUU7-Y3NnZ2d@earthlink.com...   
   >   
   >   
   > "brian mitchell"  wrote in message   
   > news:5u973cdcprjsfh97ihmrfq46pf8m83a35d@4ax.com...   
   > > "dagnabit" wrote:   
   > >   
   > >>nisargadatta maharaj once said that what he was was   
   > >>neither conceivable nor perceivable.   
   > >   
   > > Do you, or he, make some distinction between perceivable and   
   > > experienceable (ugly word, but it will have to do)? One wonders by   
   > > what means he determined that what he was was neither conceivable nor   
   > > perceivable? How did his self appear to him?   
   > >   
   >   
   >   Obviously, like this...   
   > https://rakesh108sharma.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/nisargadat   
   a_maharaj_portrait_05_18x12.jpg   
   >   
   >   How does he appear to you?   
   >   
   >  Ned   
      
   pretty much like anyone else, but he did say that a   
   self realized one could recognize another on sight.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)