Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.misc    |    Religious, ethical, & moral implications    |    30,222 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 29,228 of 30,222    |
|    Daryl Kabatoff to All    |
|    Mary, Monkey, Sun, Tree and Penis Whores    |
|    25 Aug 20 22:06:31    |
      From: doukhoborarchivescanada@gmail.com              Mary, Monkey, Sun, Tree and Penis Whoreshippers - Part C - By D. S. Kabatoff       August 25th 2020 10:49 pm 51,595 words               We read in the Hadith Number 2442 that when Mohammad wore 6-year-old       Aisha’s shit-stained panties, the panties talked and dictated the Koran.       Mohammad took off Aisha’s talking shit-stained panties and tried on the       shit-stained panties belonging to        other little girls, but those other panties would not talk, so Mohammad put       Aisha’s shit-stained panties back on and her shit-stained panties resumed       dictating the Koran (from the Sahih Collection of al-Bukhari, Hadith Number       2442). And now that we        have Aisha’s shit-stained panties dictating laws to Canadians, this       adversely affects lives of people living in Saskatoon. As a possible candidate       for Mayor of The City of Saskatoon, I’d like to make it clear that I am       opposed to this “Sharia Law”        that Aisha’s shit-stained panties proclaimed.               There is no precedent in Scripture of shit-stained panties proclaiming an       end to God’s Commandments, let alone ever talking. God’s prophets were       united in defense of His Commandments, while Aisha’s shit-stained panties       never mentioned God’s        Commandments. Mohammad can’t be a prophet of God because he only received       instruction from Aisha’s shit-stained panties, and these instructions never       mentioned God’s Commandments, nor did the instructions include a single       prophecy. And neither        Aisha nor her shit-stained panties are prophets of God, for neither Aisha, nor       her shit-stained panties spoke in defense of God’s Commandments, nor did       either utter a single prophecy.               God’s prophets are united in defense of God’s Commandments, if       Aisha’s shit-stained panties spoke in defense of God’s Commandments, then       Aisha’s shit-stained panties could possibly have a claim of being a prophet       of God. But Aisha’s shit-       stained panties neither uttered prophecy nor did they speak in defense of       God’s Commandments. If Mohammad wore the talking shit-stained panties while       the talking shit-stained panties spoke in defense of God’s Commandments and       at the same time were        uttering prophecy, this still won’t result in Mohammad being a prophet of       God, because it was the shit-stained panties that prophesized and not       Mohammad. Likely Mohammad put six-year-old Aisha’s shit-stained panties on       because they were talking while        Aisha was wearing them, although the panties belonged to Aisha an event such       as this one needs to be shared. You certainly can’t blame Aisha if her       shit-stained panties started talking. And you can’t blame Mohammad, I’m       pretty sure that most        anybody who came across a six-year-old little girl who’s shit-stained       panties were talking, would similarly remove them and try them on for him or       herself, just to see if the shit-stained panties would continue to talk. Years       later Stalin came along        and got the little kids to build composite Yaks that saved Russia from utter       ruin, but it is Mohammad that is greatly loved instead. Anyway, today       Aisha’s shit-stained panties are likely located in the basement of the       Vatican and are viewed as a        valuable relic, there they continue talking but are now coated with semen as       well.               It needs to be noted that before Mohammad removed Aisha’s shit-stained       talking panties, that he heard a voice coming from the region of her anus. How       did Mohammad know that the voice was coming from six-year-old Aisha’s       shit-stained panties rather        than her anus? Clearly Mohammad would have had to remove her panties in order       to determine where exactly the voice was coming from. It is likely that the       talking spirit originally resided in Aisha’s rectum and then later migrated       to her shit-stained        panties. There remains a possibility that Hadith Number 2442 is in error, that       the Koran was not dictated by Aisha’s shit-stained panties at all but       instead by Aisha’s arsehole. But even if that were the case, since the voice       never defended God’s        Commandments nor uttered prophecy, Aisha clearly has no claim of being a       prophet of God. And furthermore, the western media (owned by the Catholic       Church) has no basis to be calling the murderous pedophile “The Holy       Prophet”. Regardless, now in        Saskatoon and other western communities, the residents give free houses to the       newly arrived Islamists and allow these Islamists to try on their daughter’s       panties as well.               People should consider reading Hadith 2442 for themselves, when I read the       passage it is pretty clear to me that it was Aisha’s shit-stained panties       that dictated the Koran, to say otherwise would be udder heresy. The scribe       who witnessed the birth        of the Koran and documented it in Hadith Number 2442 would have been astounded       to hear Aisha’s shit-stained panties talking, no doubt. But again, how was       the scribe to know if the voice came from Aisha’s shit-stained panties       rather than from her anus?        Only if the shit-stained panties spoke while Mohammad wore them, and if at       the same time Aisha’s anus was not uttering any Koranic passages, could we       be reasonably assured that indeed, it was Aisha’s panties that spoke and       dictated the Koran.               I imagine the scribe was in a tough position, he had to have heard the       voice coming from the region of Aisha’s anus, he would have had to witness       Mohammad removing Aisha’s shit-stained panties, he would have had to watch       as Mohammad dressed up in        Aisha’s shit-stained panties, and then he would have had to heard the       shit-stained panties talking while Mohammad wore them. But the Hadith goes on       to say that Mohammad removed Aisha’s talking shit-stained panties and tried       on the shit-stained        panties belonging to other little girls in order to determine if those       shit-stained panties would talk as well, and so the scribe was present to       witness and document the entire event. I think the scribe may have witnessed       that the voice was coming from        Aisha’s and Mohammad’s arseholes, but he would have faced pressure to       instead fraudulently document that the voice was coming from Aisah’s       shit-stained panties instead. Telling Mohammad to his face that he is talking       out of his ass would likely not        go over too well for the scribe.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca