Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.misc    |    Religious, ethical, & moral implications    |    30,222 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 29,363 of 30,222    |
|    Weedy to All    |
|    Of a Pure Mind and Simple Intention (1)     |
|    26 Dec 20 23:27:09    |
      From: richarra@gmail.com              Of a Pure Mind and Simple Intention (1)              MAN is raised up from the earth by two wings-simplicity and purity.       There must be simplicity in his intention and purity in his desires.       Simplicity leads to God, purity embraces and enjoys Him. If your heart       is free from ill-ordered affection, no good deed will be difficult for       you. If you aim at and seek after nothing but the pleasure of God and       the welfare of your neighbor, you will enjoy freedom within.       --Thomas à Kempis --Imitation of Christ Book 2, Chapter 4              <<>><<>><<>>       December 27th - St. John the Evangelist.              St. John the Evangelist, like Shakespeare, has something about him       which irresistibly attracts the crank, and probably more books have       been written and more wildly fantastic theories advanced about his       writings and their authorship than about any other writer who ever       lived. The reason may perhaps lie in the strange twosidedness of his       character. How, says the critic, can works so profound have been       written by a mere Galilean fisherman? How can the author of the       Johannine epistles, with their message of love and brotherhood, be the       fire-breathing visionary of the Apocalypse? Or how can the 'Son of       Thunder' who wanted Christ to call down fire from heaven upon the       inhospitable Samaritans (Luke 9:54) be identified with the gentle       'disciple whom Jesus loved' and to whom he bequeathed the care of his       Blessed Mother? Yet no theory of multiple authorship will fit the       facts, for all these different St. Johns are intimately and       inextricably mingled in all the Johannine writings. The unlearned       fisherman is there in the extreme simplicity of syntax and vocabulary.       The mystical theologian is there in the Prologue (John 1:1 ff), the       Discourse in the upper room (John 13 to 17) and the First Epistle. The       Son of Thunder is there in the truculent speeches of Jesus and in St.       John's own denunciation of 'Antichrist' (I John 2:18 ff). The       differences between the Apocalypse and the other writings are balanced       by equally striking similarities. Even in the anecdotes of St. John's       old age, preserved by second century writers, we find the same       contrast. The aged bishop of Ephesus, who condensed all Christian       teaching into the one imperative, 'Little children, love one another,'       was the same St. John who refused to enter a public bath-house where       Cerinthus the heretic was known to be, for fear lest fire from heaven       should destroy the very building (fire from heaven again"). In short,       we are still in the same position as those priests who interrogated       St. John after Pentecost (Acts 4:13) and who, 'discovering that Peter       and John were simple men, without learning, were astonished.'       Astonishment: that is what everyone must feel who comes to close       quarters with St. John.              It is as well to remember, of course, that at least 50 years--half a       century of prayer and meditation, of teaching and debate--separate St.       John the Apostle from St. John the Evangelist. As a very young man he       had listened to John the Baptist, and when the Baptist pointed to       Jesus and said 'Behold the Lamb of God' he had transferred his       allegiance to our Lord. A few months later, when he and his elder       brother James were helping their father with his fishing, Jesus called       to them, 'and they, leaving their father Zebedee in the boat with the       hired men, turned aside after him' (Mark 1:20). Thereafter these two,       with Peter, became the closest and most constant companions of Christ.       They alone were with him at the raising of Jairus's daughter, at the       Transfiguration and in Gethsemane. After the resurrection they became,       along with James son of Alphaeus, the 'pillars of the Church'       (Galatians 2:7) in Jerusalem; but after his elder brother had been       beheaded by Herod (C. 44 A.D.) St. John seems to have left Palestine,       and it is James the Less who is bishop of Jerusalem at the time of St.       Paul's last visit (c. 57 A.D.). Of St. John's own movements between       then and his exile on the island of Patmos we know nothing. Even the       date of that exile is uncertain, depending on whether we take the       wicked emperor of the Apocalypse to be Nero or Domitian. But all       authorities agree that he spent his later years at Ephesus, acting as       patriarch to the churches of Asia; that he died there at a great age,       about the end of the century; and that it was only in these later       years that he consented, under pressure from his disciples, to commit       his Gospel to writing.              Everything that St. John ever wrote could be contained in quite a       small booklet, yet so rich is the vein that one is embarrassed to know       how best to sample it in such a brief note as this. Should one       concentrate on the famous 'Logos-doctrine'-that Christ was the 'Word'       of God, the word by which he created all things and by which he spoke       to Moses and the prophets? Or should one discuss St. John's insistence       on Faith-by which he meant not only belief in the divinity of Christ       but also an absolute and boundless trust? He certainly abhorred all       heretics, especially those who denied the actual, earthly, fleshly       reality of God-made-man in this world. Or should one concentrate on       John the contemplative, the spiritual father of all Christian monks       and nuns? Or on the visionary of the Apocalypse? Or on the poet of the       Gospel prologue?              St. John himself would probably have said that the whole of him is       summed up in the single sentence of his first Epistle (I John 4:8),       that 'God is love.' It was love which had brought God down to earth in       the person of Jesus, and it is only by love-of God and of his       fellowmen--that a man can join himself, through Christ, to God. And       this union with God--for the body in the Blessed Sacrament, for the       mind and will by faith and good works-is the only thing that matters.       It is life and light and victory and bliss, here and everywhere, now       and forever. But it can all be summed up and bound together by the one       word 'love.' Love of God implies faith and trust and obedience. Love       of our neighbor implies all that is meant by 'right conduct.' All       goodness, all happiness, all wisdom is included in that single word.              'And he who sat on the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. I       am Alpha, I am Omega, the beginning of all things and their end; those       who are thirsty shall drink--it is my free gift--out of the spring       whose water is life. (Revelation 21:5.)              Jesus had promised that water to Nicodemus (John 3:5), to the       Samaritan woman (John 4:13) and to all the world (John 7:37), but it              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca