XPost: alt.bible, alt.messianic, alt.religion.christian   
   XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife   
   From: tiller@soil.org.9   
      
   >  > but, its geometric progression tells   
   >  > us that even the breakup of the monotony   
   >  > will become the schedule   
      
   > so, one could say that such a   
      
   >      'breakup of the monotony'   
      
   > -initiates the inclusion- of a   
   > finer detail into the 'schedule.'   
      
   > and this finer detail affords a   
   > greater stability to the system.   
      
      
   sort of like, when some people are-were   
   in developeMental stages, the little wax wheel   
   in their brains had a large rut laid down as   
   opposed to fine grooves.   
      
   and every stimulus and thought that comes   
   to them, gravitates into that particular   
   rut and they interpret these based on   
   comparisons to that catch-all rut.   
      
   while these may not be able to recoup   
   a system of fine grooves in their heads,   
   they can terrace that rut so as to slowly   
   creep out of that rut and not be a prisoner   
   to a knee that doesn't even jerk any more.   
      
   needless to say, everyone should probably   
   be continuously fine tuning their brain waves   
   so as to avoid any similarly perilous precipices,   
   and to avoid falling over to cliffs into headlong   
   spiralling towards abyssmal mentallities.   
      
   we have help.   
      
   etcetera etcetera etcetera   
      
      
      
      
      
   it has something to do with a stumbling block.   
      
   like there's a seemingly trivial barrier.   
      
   and then i fade back into the stuff   
   everyone has heard several times.   
      
   is 'good deeds' a result or a cause?   
      
   in as much as -it-, 'good deeds', can be   
   a result and a cause, one can trip over   
   -it-, 'good deeds'   
      
   when is it result and when is is cause?   
      
   in this funny place, around the stumbling block,   
   it seems as if 'good deeds' is -first- a result   
   and -then- a cause.   
      
   speaking of the love of God,   
      
   'good deeds' don't cause God to love,   
      
   the love of God will result in 'good deeds'   
      
   and then, 'good deeds' will, in a sense,   
   cause or bring about, a deeper and more   
   profound understanding of God in   
   the abiding presence.   
      
   so, in a certain sense,   
   as the stumbling block   
   is processed correctly, ....what?   
      
   what?   
      
   or is that obvious?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)