XPost: alt.philosophy, talk.philosophy.misc, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: always@ask.questions   
      
   On 26/12/2012 12:56 AM, TheInquirer wrote:   
   > On 25/12/2012 11:34 PM, Immortalist wrote:   
      
   >> - A Skeptical Rejoinder: The Employment of the Notion   
   >> of Probability Begs the Question Against the Skeptic   
   >   
   > very good. and that was _precisely_ why i asked   
      
      
   oh, by the way, is it well known that "level of significance" in   
   statistical tests are just conditional probabilities?   
      
      
   --   
   I ask, becos I'm curious.   
      
   Just answer the damn question, not the questioner!  Don't   
   presume.  My personal matters/beliefs are none of your   
   business.  I ask, you answer.  If you think my questions   
   are stupid, you have already proven that you are stupid,   
   not me.  If you don't know the answer, can you please   
   "pass" to more capable person(s) to answer?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)