XPost: alt.philosophy, talk.philosophy.misc, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: always@ask.questions   
      
   On 27/12/2012 1:32 AM, DonH wrote:   
   > "TheInquirer"  wrote in message   
   > news:kbc16u$qro$1@dont-email.me...   
      
      
   >      Only the empirical tests of the Scientific Method keep us relatively   
   > sane.   
      
      
   is it possible to have just the methodological naturalism without the   
   philosophical naturalism?   
      
      
   --   
   I ask, becos I'm curious.   
      
   Just answer the damn question, not the questioner!  Don't   
   presume.  My personal matters/beliefs are none of your   
   business.  I ask, you answer.  If you think I am stupid,   
   you have already proven that you are stupid, not me.  If   
   you don't know the answer, can you please "pass" to other   
   people to answer?  thanks.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)