XPost: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic, talk.religion.misc   
   XPost: alt.religion   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   In article ,   
    "Nobody in Particular"  wrote:   
      
   > > "David Dalton"  wrote in message   
   > > news:dalton-8E4326.02162131122012@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > >   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  "Nobody in Particular"  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > > "David Dalton"  wrote in message   
   > > > > news:dalton-DBE440.00580931122012@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I am not pushing my twelve main deities on anybody, but   
   > > > > I am hoping that my similarity to past major religious   
   > > > > figures will get some people to read my main messages   
   > > > > on my Salmon on the Thorns web page.   However those   
   > > > > are currently a bit rambly and I plan to edit them   
   > > > > for better writing style but don't plan to change the   
   > > > > content much if at all.  And, yes, I know I still have   
   > > > > lots to learn, plus I hope to come up with new   
   > > > > insights when I am released from the low years.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Tonight I divined that the last attempt at assisted   
   > > > > shaktipat was a false one and that I had to remove   
   > > > > two-way love interests (of other recipients) from   
   > > > > the list of recipients.   With that in mind the   
   > > > > assisted shaktipat is supposedly in progress, but   
   > > > > I am skeptical after so many false attempts.   
   > > >   
   > > > Have you ever considered the possibility that you are just trying to   
   > > > assign   
   > > > meaning to totally random occurrences?   
   > >   
   > > You mean the perineum click divination?   I guess it is a   
   > > form of ideomotor divination, and it is true that it   
   > > hasn't been very reliable for me and I have learned   
   > > to not blindly believe it.  But if you mean my mystic   
   > > cycles,  five waning crescent highs and eight waxing   
   > > gibbous moon trials were not random.   
   >   
   > Or so you believe.   
      
   How are they random if all five highs were during waning   
   crescent moon and all eight trials were during waxing   
   gibbous moon.    Moreover three of the trials each followed   
   5.5 lunar months after a high.   That is not random.   
      
   --   
   David Dalton  dalton@nfld.com   http://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)   
   http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/nf.html Newfoundland&Labrador Travel & Music   
   http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)   
      "Here I go again...back into the flame" (Sarah McLachlan)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)