Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.newage    |    Esoteric and minority religions & philos    |    9,157 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,335 of 9,157    |
|    ibshambat@gmail.com to All    |
|    Spirituality and Anecdotal Evidence    |
|    26 Aug 13 04:39:48    |
      A person who's had spiritual experiences and tells people about them is       typically met with attack. There are some people who define reality as what       can be proven. By that standard nothing is real because nothing can be proven       to everyone (try proving        something to a person with brain damage or to a person who thinks that       dinosaur bones are there to test people's faith in the Biblical worldview).       Reality however is not what can be proven; it exists regardless of people's       opinions about it. Reality is        not rightly defined as what can be proven but rather as something that exists,       whatever people's views about it may be.              The scientific approach does not accept anecdotal evidence. But what is       anecdotal evidence? It is someone's stated experience. The things that       somebody has experienced would be seen as anecdotal, but it does not make them       any less real. Something is not        made not real because it didn't happen in a lab. It may not be enough for a       scientist; it is enough for the person to whom it has happened.              One fad, which names itself skepticism but is more correctly named bullying,       has been to discredit the people reporting spiritual experiences. This has       resulted in abuse - in many cases severe abuse. That is an inevitable result       of such attitudes. You        think that nothing spiritual can exist, you think that the people reporting       spiritual experiences are crazy or stupid, you become an abuser against them.       It is a logical outcome of the underlying belief.              And yet spiritual experiences continue to exist, as they have always existed.       The real issue is figuring out what they mean. Some claim these things to be       proof of Christianity or Islam; others claim them to mean any number of other       things. Genuine        scientific inquiry into this matter is necessary in order to provide a solid       contextual framework that is required to actually understand the forces       involved. Otherwise people who have spiritual experiences will leave       rationality altogether and will join        entities like the Christian Right that militate against science as such.              The biggest difference between the skeptic and the scientist is that the       scientist actually bothers to investigate things, whereas the skeptic does       not. There are any number of real scientists who have either had or observed       others having spiritual        experiences, and I am acquainted with a highly accomplished scientist who has       both personal and academic knowledge on this matter. Real scientists are also       open-minded and are less likely to dismiss things without investigating.       Finally no real scientist        uses the ad-hominem fallacy that is the meat and potatoes of the abusers'       modus operandi.              One is not made a credophile by having spiritual experiences, nor is one made       by them a conman, a psychotic or an idiot. For most history most people       believed in something spiritual or other - indeed that also is the case now -       and it is arrogance and        stupidity to claim that all of these people are delusionary or dumb. In the       traditional societies, the smartest people became shamans. These were in no       way stupid people, and much of what they came up with has benefit even in the       contemporary society.               As does what comes from contemporaries who likewise have had spiritual       experiences or been availed of one or another spiritual truth.              The abusive "skeptics" are the biggest problem on this matter; but there are       also problems in the academia. It is extremely hard to get funding for       research into spiritual and telepathic experiences, and then there's the claim       that "an extraordinary        claim requires an extraordinary level of proof." For the life of me I see       nothing extraordinary at all about something that most people believe in. It       is extraordinary to the materialist fundamentalist; it is not extraordinary to       most people in the world.              Is science wrong? Absolutely not; but bigotry is. And what we see with attacks       on the people who have spiritual experiences is bigotry. These attackers       haven't had spiritual experiences themselves and don't know what they are       talking about. That        something hasn't happened to you doesn't mean that it hasn't happened to       anyone else.              Another line of attacks comes from people who think that spiritual experience       is of the Satan. By that standard, every Hindu, every Muslim, every Buddhist,       every Jew, every secular person, who does not name Jesus his lord and savior,       is of the Satan and        is hell-bound. And that leaves one in a very large and distinguished company.       Most spiritual experiences that transpire do so outside of the Christian       framework; and among Christians themselves we also see some having spiritual       experience and others not        having spiritual experience - not at a visibly lesser or greater rate than       among non-Christians. Is Satan really so strong as to delude the vast bulk of       humanity - and God so weak as to allow him to do that? I think not. Whoever is       the author of these        experiences, it's not Satan; any more than are the dinosaur bones there in       order to test people's faith.              The person who has spiritual experiences has to sail between the Scylla of       ignorance and the Charybdis of intolerance - between materialist       fundamentalists who deny spirituality altogether and the Christian Right who       take it into a toxic place. As a        result, it is a difficult place to inhabit. However the more real knowledge is       accumulated about such matters, the more is there to make that life bearable       and productive. The more this is done, the more humanity stands to benefit       from the people who        have spiritual experiences and the better will be the lot of humanity.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca