Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.religion.newage    |    Esoteric and minority religions & philos    |    9,157 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,649 of 9,157    |
|    ibshambat@gmail.com to All    |
|    Responsibility And The New Age (1/2)    |
|    26 Sep 16 01:39:42    |
      An idea that has been made popular especially in the New Age movement is that       everyone is responsible for everything that happens to them, and that nobody       can either help or hurt anyone else. I find this idea to be morally wrong as       well as factually        wrong.              I do not “whine” about my life; my life has been an enviable one, and I       know it. Instead I place credit where credit is due. I had a wonderful mother,       excellent teachers, and the influence of all kinds of good people. Similarly       the New Agers have        also had the influence of all kinds of good people – the teachers who       educated them, the police and the military that protect them, the scientists       whose work is at the root of most of business sells, and both the businessmen       and the laborers who have        produced their prosperity. People have all sorts of effect on all sorts of       other people, both for good and for ill, and denying this is not       responsibility, it is blindness.              Is responsibility a virtue? Of course it is. But externalization of costs and       misplacement of credit is not. When the Texas Oil poisons the oceans and the       air, or when the Brazilian farmers burn down Amazonian rainforest, all sorts       of people and all        sorts of conscious life suffer or die. It is not the fault of those who die;       it is the fault of Texas Oil and Brazilian farmers. The claim that everyone is       responsible for everything that happens to them enables these people in the       crimes that they        commit, and the material and political success that they achieve through       wrongful methods gets rewarded under the false claim that it is their       responsibility.              True responsibility presupposes knowledge. Without knowledge people do things       that they regard as being responsible but are not. They drive Hummers. They       poison the oceans and the air. They destroy countless treasures that they       cannot conceivably        recreate. They beat up on the “nerds” and the “sluts.” They credit       themselves for their temporary prosperity while denying the role that science,       education, and government infrastructure and government protection of property       rights has had in        making it possible. None of these actions are remotely responsible.              A family member of mine had a sign on her fridge that said, “You are       responsible for everything you are. That is not the truth; it is a place to       start.” If something is not the truth, then it is definitely not the place       to start. Anything that is not        based on the truth is going to come crashing down. This is likewise in no way       a responsible behavior. It is a behavior that creates false starts that work       for a while, then turn into a turkey.              Nor is talking about social issues “whining” or “blaming” or anything       of the sort. The first step toward solving a problem is articulating it. Real       solutions do not come from acting like a grade-school coach; they come from       real insight and real        understanding of the issues involved.              In “Goodbye Lenin,” a person from West Germany was telling a person from       East Germany that his mother was a whiner because she was talking about social       issues. His response was that she was not whining; she was offering       constructive criticisms that        people could use in order to improve. I do the exact same thing, and I am       continuing to do so with all sorts of places every day. That likewise is not       “whining” or “blaming.” That is actual responsibility.              This, then, becomes the actual place of the intellectual. America has a long       history of hating intellectuals; but it owes its nationhood to ones. Without       them damn intellectuals like Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin, most Americans       would be serfs under        one or another European monarchy, and they would be taking responsibility for       a life of tilling a two-acre plot of land, living till age of 30, and having       their sons drafted into the military and their daughters into domestic       servitude.              Instead this attitude fails to place credit where credit is legitimately due.       These people owe greatly to scientists, teachers, the military, the police,       business, labor and many others; and they take credit for a privileged       position that is owed, not to        them, but to many others besides them. Many of them had a role in getting to       where they are, but they do not begin to deserve the full credit for it. Much       of it is owed to many other people besides them. And in claiming that nobody       can either help or        hurt another, they are failing to credit all sorts of people to whom they owe       what they have.              The baby boomers started out wanting to change the world. Then they were met       with a greater force; at which point they went totally into themselves and       created a religion of self. For this they are hated by many, especially       Generation X and any number of        people in my generation. Some of them did in fact become effective people, and       they do deserve credit for that. But their parents were likewise effective,       and they believed in no such thing; and their reputation has been far better.              Once again, I do not “whine” about my life. My life has been a privileged       one. I do not credit for this my “consciousness” or anything of the sort;       I credit for this the influences that I have had. I have had both successes       and failures, both for        all sorts of reasons of which I am well aware. At this point my concern is       neither my happiness nor my freedom nor my peace of mind. At this point my       concern is leaving a better world for our children than we have found it.              Which, in fact, demands a far greater amount of responsibility than does       merely seeking one's freedom or peace of mind.              If all you care about is your freedom or peace of mind, then do by all means       take the advice of the New Agers. But I have other concerns. I do not want my       daughter to grow up in a toxic hell or to be prey of Muslim or right-wing       cultures that want to        treat her as a punching bag. Nor do I want to see her being maliciously       attacked by Third Wave feminists for being pretty and kind and unwilling to       practice their vicious party line. You may get a better degree of personal       freedom and peace of mind by        not putting yourself in harm's way; but sometimes it's necessary to put       oneself in harm's way to protect what one loves. I am not “whining” about       this; I am taking responsibility for correcting wrongs and addressing social       issues.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca