XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, alt.recovery.catholicism
XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:48:04 -0500, Wuss Lee wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:15:43 +0000 (UTC), Smil
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:03:06 -0500, bilgat wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:58:07 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 14:45:17 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
>>>>.
>>>>>On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:36:40 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:37:32 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote:
>>>>>>.
>>>>>>>On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 11:44:59 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 01:56:12 -0230, David Dalton
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>.
>>>>>>>>>These days I am having some doubts about my eight main deities and
>>>>>>>>>am considering going atheist again
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Strong or weak?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>what are they
>>>>>>_________________________________________________________
>>>>>>Atheism may or may not be a position of faith, depending on the type
>>>>>>of atheism
>
>Once again we see a stupid, rude, pig-ignorant theist incapable of
>grasping the world beyond his religion.
>
>>>>>There is only one kind of atheist loser.. The kind that has no belief
>>>>
>>>> You've clearly acted like you have strong faith in your own belief
>>>> being
>>>>correct:
>>>>_________________________________________________________
>>>>"if you are reffering to the fact that I know there is no god" -
>>>>bilgat@m.nu
>
>All he has to do is apply simple, basic logic to the nonsense theists
>insist on telling us.
>
>>>>"I have admitted numerous times that I *KNOW* there is not god. On this
>>>>planet or any others for that matter." - bilgat@m.nu
>>>>
>>>>"I myself as an anti theist in fact {know} there is no god." -
>>>>bilgat@m.nu
>>>>
>>>>"what ever evidence is brought forth it will have been conjured from
>>>>someones imagination just as your god is and previous gods were and
>>>>future gods will be."
>>>>- bilgat@m.nu
>
>Why don't these morons even try to understand what is explained over
>and over again?
>
>>>>"trying to define the type of imaginary god is pointless. They are all
>>>>imaginary." - bilgat@m.nu
>>>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>>>>but then stupidly, as is the best you're capable of, you've claimed
>>>>other stupid things like:
>
>Lie.
>
>>>>_________________________________________________________
>>>>"If one believes that god does not exist that means that person is not
>>>>an atheist" - bilgat@m.nu
>
>???
>
>>>>"if You have FAITH OF ANYKIND whatsoever about weather god exists you
>>>>are a theist" - bilgat@m.nu
>>>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>>>>Your stupid claims are on a level of stupidity that the average person
>>>>can't think down to, but instead are just amusing ideas that most people
>>>>would not be stupid enough to have on their own and therefore of some
>>>>interest because of how impressively stupid they are. But as
>>>>usual/always I'm encouraging you to try to create the impression that
>>>>they are not really as incredibly stupid as they clearly appear to be,
>>>>by challenging you to try to explain how you want people to think you
>>>>think you disagree with yourself about any or all of it. Instead of just
>>>>wussing away from the challenge, try explaining now.
>
>Lie.
>
>>> dude you have collected some of my best quotes.. Some of those are
>>> really good. It is good to know that I have fans of my writing.
>
>And he is too narcissistic even to try and understand what people with
>a perspective from outside his religion tell him.
If you think you know the answer then YOU try to explain how you think he
wants people to think he thinks he disagrees with himself about any or all of
it.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
