XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, alt.recovery.catholicism   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
      
   On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:43:11 -0400, PATRICK  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:21:35 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:43:38 -0400, PATRICK wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:59:11 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 07:07:24 -0400, PATRICK    
   >>>>wrote:   
   >>>>.   
   >>>>>On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 04:53:04 -0230, David Dalton    
   >>>>>wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>In article ,   
   >>>>>> PATRICK  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> David Dalton  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> >Why?  Why would any someone want to be worshipped?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Why are you posting here?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>If by here you mean alt.recovery.catholicism then obviously I am   
   >>>>>>posting there because I am a recovering ex-Catholic, which I assume is   
   >>>>>>the purpose of the group.   Why are you posting there, since as far as   
   >>>>>>I know you are a current Catholic, not a recovering ex-Catholic?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I am looking to ensure people do not lie about the religion.   
   >>>>>You are obviously a liar.   
   >>>>>And I am calling you on it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Sounds like good fun :-)  What shall we say he's lying about?   
   >>>   
   >>> He is obviously NOT a recovering Catholic.   
   >>> He is a loudmouth bully looking to piss people off.   
   >>   
   >>In your case, he appears to have succeeded.   
   >>But then, _you_ are easily pissed off.   
   >   
   >Only at you stupid liars who can't even get any facts correct.   
      
       There are some very basic starting lines these people can't get as "far"   
   as.   
   One is the possibility that there might be a god associated with this planet.   
   Some of them have said they can't even comprehend what that means. Another   
   basic   
   starting line they can't get as "far" as is the fact that if God does exist he   
   doesn't provide us with proof of his existence (which they refer to as   
   "evidence") because  if he wants things to be as they are, providing the proof   
   they beg for would change things too much. Also, though they ask for and demand   
   evidence consistently, when challenged to try to explain WHAT sort of evidence   
   they think there should be, WHERE they think it should be, and WHY they think   
   it   
   should be to God's benefit to provide us with it, not one of them has yet been   
   able to make any attempt to try explaining what they think they keep demanding.   
   They are clueless as to what they think they're trying to talk about.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)