XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, alt.recovery.catholicism   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
      
   On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:05:32 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur@.not.   
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:43:38 -0400, PATRICK  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:59:11 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >>On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 07:07:24 -0400, PATRICK  wrote:   
   >> >>.   
   >> >>>On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 04:53:04 -0230, David Dalton    
   >> >>>wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>In article ,   
   >> >>>> PATRICK  wrote:   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>> David Dalton  wrote:   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> >Why?  Why would any someone want to be worshipped?   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> Why are you posting here?   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>If by here you mean alt.recovery.catholicism then   
   >> >>>>obviously I am posting there because I am a   
   >> >>>>recovering ex-Catholic, which I assume is the   
   >> >>>>purpose of the group.   Why are you posting there,   
   >> >>>>since as far as I know you are a current   
   >> >>>>Catholic, not a recovering ex-Catholic?   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>I am looking to ensure people do not lie about the religion.   
   >> >>>You are obviously a liar.   
   >> >>>And I am calling you on it.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>    Sounds like good fun :-)  What shall we say he's lying about?   
   >> >   
   >> >He is obviously NOT a recovering Catholic.   
   >>   
   >>     How's that?   
   >   
   >I'm a recovering ex-Catholic, recovering from Catholic   
   >upbringing, and I assume that alt.recovery.catholicism   
   >is for such people, in parallel with   
   >alt.recovery.addiction.alcoholism for example.   
      
       It seems very unlikely that any particular faith has everything correct. It   
   seems more like there's truth associated with all of them, or at least all that   
   God (or whatever) has any involvment with. One of the basic easy concepts these   
   atheists seem unable to comprehend is that people can refer to the same being   
   in   
   a lot of different ways, and have a lot of different beliefs about him. The   
   same   
   is true of the sun and moon, etc. It's another easy basic starting line that   
   atheists can't get as "far" as, yet they think they're authorities on the   
   topic.   
   They think the fact that there are a lot of different beliefs about and names   
   for God means there are somehow lots of different gods, while at the same time   
   somehow also believing there are none. LOL...again just describing the position   
   they're in is hilarious.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)