home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.atheism      Debate about the validity and nature of      89,766 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 87,947 of 89,766   
   mur@.not. to David Dalton   
   Re: having some doubts   
   24 Jun 14 11:06:14   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, alt.recovery.catholicism   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
      
   On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:04:12 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:   
   .   
   >In article <5qd6q9ppr74n6kr5dciqt3bei6g2nc8fbm@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:02:22 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >In article <19bmp9hme2n7tg15gvfe17n76r9t4bnfj1@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >> >wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:27:57 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >In article , mur@.not.   
   >> >> >wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 02:56:34 -0230, David Dalton    
   >> >> >> wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> >> >4.  mystic "live" sparks as opposed to dead normal static ones   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>     Where?   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >The first one was in the center of my inner right forearm.   
   >> >> >I was barefoot at the time and the air wasn't very dry and   
   >> >> >I was standing in the middle of the room well away from   
   >> >> >any metal.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     How long did it last and what did it do?   
   >> >   
   >> >It didn't last long, maybe half a second, and it zapped   
   >> >me, but I didn't see any light.   Also it felt more   
   >> >alive, like a hummingbird, than a usual static zap.   
   >>   
   >>     Well if a deity had something to do with it then there doesn't seem like   
   >> there's much point in trying to pretend otherwise.   
   >   
   >Since that first spark occurred when my then yoga teacher   
   >was demonstrating Valakhilyasana,  I attribute the   
   >mystic sparks to Valakhilya, who in B.K.S. Iyengar's   
   >Light on Yoga are defined as thumb-sized entities   
   >that precede the sun's chariot.  I refer to them as   
   >little messengers of the sun, and consider them to   
   >be energy beings and a form of angels, but not as   
   >deities to me   
      
       My impression is that angels are messengers of deities as yours also seems   
   to be, so they are still evidence of the deity and also that it's trying to   
   help   
   you understand something.   
      
   >(though the sun is a deity to me).   
      
       Why would you consider the sun to be a deity?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca