XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, alt.recovery.catholicism   
   XPost: talk.philosophy.humanism   
      
   On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:04:15 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:   
   .   
   >In article <0v4jq9pegu8jsja3ohufh7hb9s9hlmga5n@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:24:04 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:26:15 -0400, PATRICK    
   >> >wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >>On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:34:55 -0500, Free Lunch    
   >> >>wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >>>On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:17:27 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>>On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:02:22 -0230, David Dalton    
   wrote:   
   >> >>>>.   
   >> >>>>>In article <19bmp9hme2n7tg15gvfe17n76r9t4bnfj1@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >> >>>>>wrote:   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:27:57 -0230, David Dalton    
   >> >>>>>> wrote:   
   >> >>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>> >In article , mur@.not.   
   >> >>>>>> >wrote:   
   >> >>>>>> >   
   >> >>>>>> >> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 02:56:34 -0230, David Dalton    
   >> >>>>>> >> wrote:   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>>> >> >4.  mystic "live" sparks as opposed to dead normal static ones   
   >> >>>>>> >>   
   >> >>>>>> >>     Where?   
   >> >>>>>> >   
   >> >>>>>> >The first one was in the center of my inner right forearm.   
   >> >>>>>> >I was barefoot at the time and the air wasn't very dry and   
   >> >>>>>> >I was standing in the middle of the room well away from   
   >> >>>>>> >any metal.   
   >> >>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>>     How long did it last and what did it do?   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>>It didn't last long, maybe half a second, and it zapped   
   >> >>>>>me, but I didn't see any light.   Also it felt more   
   >> >>>>>alive, like a hummingbird, than a usual static zap.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>    Well if a deity had something to do with it then there doesn't seem   
   >> >>>>    like   
   >> >>>>there's much point in trying to pretend otherwise.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>Why do you pretend that there are deities when there is no reason to   
   >> >>>accept such a silly claim?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>Why do you deny the existence of something you can't understand?   
   >> >   
   >> >I tentatively deny the existence of everything that is posited without   
   >> >any supporting evidence   
   >>   
   >>     AGAIN I present you with a basic challenge that has so far completely   
   >> defeated every one of you atheists so entirely that none of you have yet   
   been   
   >> able to attempt to address it:   
   >>   
   >> If God does exist WHAT type of evidence do atheists think there "should be"?   
   >> WHERE do atheists think the evidence they beg for "should be"? WHY do   
   >> atheists   
   >> think it "should be" to God's benefit for him to provide us with whatever   
   >> particular evidence they keep whining about?   
   >   
   >I think that God, or gods, like diversity, and hence are not   
   >providing evidence for any one viewpoint.   
      
       It's clear that they provide enough evidence to persuade billions of people   
   of their existence, if they or He or whatever do/does exist.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)