XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism   
   From: quoththeraven@nevermore.com   
      
   On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:16:40 -0400, James Redford   
    wrote:   
      
   >Interestingly, this also means that the existence of biological   
   >evolution, far from demonstrating that God is unnecessary, is in fact   
   >a logical proof of God's existence *unless* one posits the additional   
   >postulate that there is a limit to evolution. Yet there is no logical   
   >limit to evolution other than infinite complexity; and there exists no   
   >empirical evidence that evolution is finitely-bounded.   
      
   Even if one granted those premises, there is no empirical evidence   
   that any kind of God has, in fact, evolved yet, so at best they would   
   suggest that such a thing is possible, not prove that a God exists.   
   But since the premises are trivially false (biological evolution is,   
   in fact, constrained by chemistry and physics), that's a moot point.   
      
   ---   
   raven1   
   aa # 1096   
   EAC Vice President (President in charge of vice)   
   BAAWA Knight   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)