XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism   
      
   On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:46:19 -0400, raven1  wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:16:40 -0400, James Redford   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>Interestingly, this also means that the existence of biological   
   >>evolution, far from demonstrating that God is unnecessary, is in fact   
   >>a logical proof of God's existence *unless* one posits the additional   
   >>postulate that there is a limit to evolution. Yet there is no logical   
   >>limit to evolution other than infinite complexity; and there exists no   
   >>empirical evidence that evolution is finitely-bounded.   
   >   
   >Even if one granted those premises, there is no empirical evidence   
   >that any kind of God has, in fact, evolved yet, so at best they would   
   >suggest that such a thing is possible, not prove that a God exists.   
      
       WHAT sort of evidence/proof do you think there should be, WHERE do you   
   think   
   it should be, WHY do you think he should provide it, and WHEN do you think he   
   should provide or should have provided it if there is a God associated with   
   Earth?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)