home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.atheism      Debate about the validity and nature of      89,766 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 88,368 of 89,766   
   Smiler to mur   
   Re: Theotech: God Is the Ultimate Techno   
   09 May 15 22:02:43   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism   
   From: smiler@jo.king   
      
   On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:02:45 -0400, mur wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:41:53 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:   
   > .   
   >>On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:05:42 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:46:19 -0400, raven1   
   >>>    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:16:40 -0400, James Redford   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Interestingly, this also means that the existence of biological   
   >>>>>evolution, far from demonstrating that God is unnecessary, is in fact   
   >>>>>a logical proof of God's existence *unless* one posits the additional   
   >>>>>postulate that there is a limit to evolution. Yet there is no logical   
   >>>>>limit to evolution other than infinite complexity; and there exists   
   >>>>>no empirical evidence that evolution is finitely-bounded.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Even if one granted those premises, there is no empirical evidence   
   >>>>that any kind of God has, in fact, evolved yet, so at best they would   
   >>>>suggest that such a thing is possible, not prove that a God exists.   
   >>>   
   >>>     WHAT sort of evidence/proof do you think there should be, WHERE do   
   >>>     you think   
   >>> it should be, WHY do you think he should provide it, and WHEN do you   
   >>> think he should provide or should have provided it if there is a God   
   >>> associated with Earth?   
   >>   
   >>The exact same objective evidence that persuaded _you_ that your   
   >>supposed god character exists.   
   >   
   >     There is none and it makes sense that there is not. That's one of   
   >     the basic   
   > starting lines atheists can't get as "far" as.   
      
   Thanks for admitting that you believe in your supposed god character   
   without a single scrap of evidence.   
      
   I've this lovely bridge I want to sell. Are you interested in buying it?   
      
   P.T. Barnum was right.   
      
   --   
   Smiler, The godless one.   
   aa #2279   
   Gods are all tailored to order. They are made   
   to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca