XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "Smiler"  skrev i meddelelsen news:mitu3k$nuv$1@speranza.aioe.org...   
   >   
   > On Mon, 11 May 2015 22:24:39 +0000, Smiler wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sat, 09 May 2015 22:07:13 +0000, Smiler wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:02:03 -0400, mur wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:46:59 -0500, Mitchell Holman    
   > >>> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>mur wrote in news:cfs2kat7bmirb4et3itpn7grae2ejj3p2t@4ax.com:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:16:40 -0400, James Redford   
   > >>>>>  wrote: . . .   
   > >>>>>>Thus, immortality is logically inseparable from the existence of the   
   > >>>>>>capital-G God, since mathematically, immortality requires the   
   > >>>>>>existence of either an infinite computational state or a finite   
   > >>>>>>state which diverges to an infinite computational state (i.e.,   
   > >>>>>>diverging to literal Godhead in all its fullness), thus allowing for   
   > >>>>>>states to never repeat and hence an infinite number of experiences.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>     Something would have to preserve the sense of self of the   
   > >>>>>     individual, and   
   > >>>>> somehow retain the sense of identity. From my position it seems God   
   > >>>>> would have to do that for himself and any other beings he chose to   
   > >>>>> do it for.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>Consequently, transhumanism--if the goal by that position is   
   > >>>>>>immortality--is inherently theistic, not only in a lowercase-G god   
   > >>>>>>sense, but also in the capital-G God sense.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>Interestingly, this also means that the existence of biological   
   > >>>>>>evolution, far from demonstrating that God is unnecessary, is in   
   > >>>>>>fact a logical proof of God's existence *unless* one posits the   
   > >>>>>>additional postulate that there is a limit to evolution. Yet there   
   > >>>>>>is no logical limit to evolution other than infinite complexity; and   
   > >>>>>>there exists no empirical evidence that evolution is   
   > >>>>>>finitely-bounded. Thus, to believe that evolution has a finite   
   > >>>>>>cut-off would be to hold a belief without evidence, and thus it   
   > >>>>>>would be an irrational belief.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>     The fact that there are no beings in apparent transition from   
   > >>>>>     reptiles to   
   > >>>>> birds today, and very few fossil examples, is evidence that God   
   > >>>>> influenced evolution.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>  So you don't believe in evolution   
   > >>>   
   > >>>     Prevent your supposed evidence of that.   
   > >>   
   > >> Was that meant to be English?   
   > >>   
   > >>>>but you also believe your god is influencing it.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>  Most odd.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>     You can't comprehend the basic possibility that God infuenced   
   > >>>     evolution.   
   > >>> Other people can.   
   > >>   
   > >> What god would that be? The one you admit that you have no evidence   
   > >> for?   
   > >   
   > >    
   >   
   >    
   >   
      
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)