XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism
From: smiler@jo.king
On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:23:33 -0400, mur wrote:
> On Sat, 30 May 2015 20:55:29 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
> .
>>On Fri, 29 May 2015 20:45:41 -0400, mur wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 22 May 2015 19:30:22 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>.
>>>>On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:04:27 -0400, mur wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 9 May 2015 21:56:26 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>> .
>>>>>>On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:02:27 -0400, mur wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:39:01 -0400, raven1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:18:42 -0400, "Chris F.A. Johnson"
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 2015-04-30, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>...
>>>>>>>>>> The fact that there are no examples of reptiles in
>>>>>>>>>> transition stages to
>>>>>>>>>> birds, or mammals in transition stages to flying mammals, etc,
>>>>>>>>>> alive today is evidence that something (like God) had
>>>>>>>>>> deliberate influence on evolution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If there are no examples, it is evidence that they either
>>>>>>>>> haven't been found yet or that there aren't any. It says
>>>>>>>>> nothing whatsoever about the existence of something like God
>>>>>>>>> or anything else.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>We do have transitional fossils of reptile-to-bird evolution,
>>>>>>>>Archaeopteryx being the most celebrated. But whether we did or
>>>>>>>>not, you are correct that this is irrelevant to the existence of a
>>>>>>>>deity,
>>>>>>>>and it's involvement or not in the process.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's your guess, and you obviously have great faith in your
>>>>>>> guess being
>>>>>>> correct, but so far you've given no reason why everyone else
>>>>>>> should put their faith in it being correct. How about if you give
>>>>>>> everybody reason to now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No faith is needed when there is scientific evidence,
>>>>>
>>>>> Of what?
>>>>>
>>>>>>of which there is plenty.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why didn't you present it then?
>>>>
>>>>Why should I bother?
>>>
>>> Why "should" you? LOL....HILARIOUS!
>>>
>>>>Your closed mind and religious blinders would prevent you from even
>>>>seeing it, let alone understanding it.
>>>
>>> You tried to find something to support your claim but couldn't find
>>>anything. Maybe at some point in the future you will, or maybe you
>>>never will be able to, but you're infantile wussings have made it clear
>>>that you couldn't support your claims the last time I challenged you to
>>>try.
>>
>>Snipped [Restore]at first lie. Why should I cast my pearls before swine?
[end restore]
>
> To provide some evidence that you have any idea at all what you
> think you're
> trying to talk about. So far you've given the clear appearance that you
> don't have any idea and can't even pretend you do.
Your mental masturbation is yours and yours alone.
>>Would it change your mind? Would anything change your mind?
>
> Your cowardly attempts to wuss away from yourself certainly don't.
> If you
> could do better it might, depending on what you could come up with. I do
> consider the possibility that there's no God associated with this
> planet, but since I don't have faith in that being the correct one I
> consider other possibilities as well.
Thanks for admitting that NOTHING would change your closed mind.
--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
